Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hahahahahahahahaha

2018-07-06 Thread Mnyb
Well :) this is all fun , but if you really want to make fun of an audiophool product there are far worse out there . Except for the price this NAD product is quite “normal” 10-30 k$ dacs that performs worse than a 400$ DVD player from China for example that is ofcourse adored by the high end mag

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hahahahahahahahaha

2018-07-06 Thread ftlight
Golden Earring wrote: > I think at my age I'd rather get an Orgasmatron - it would save me a lot > of physical effort... > > Dave :D I'd want the version that comes with Jane Fonda... I have, however, sat in an Orgone box (sadly, to no effect): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgone Bill -

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hahahahahahahahaha

2018-07-06 Thread Golden Earring
ftlight wrote: > In a foreshadowing of many future audiophile devices, John W Campbell, > the editor of Astounding Science Fiction magazine, and a big proponent > in the 1950s of the Hieronymus Machine, the Dean Drive, the Scientology > E-meter and other similar devices, showed by experiment tha