me know what you think?
>
> Frank
OK... just to clarify, I really am just looking for an explanation
(this isn't a veiled attack on tubes or whatever). So: why would you
get a different result doing the modwright rather than using a tubed
amp? I don't get it--isnt
it was worth it to me, even if I only turn on Windows
every few days to rip and such. If you refuse to do windows, you could
use Fusion to run a Linux image and use Wine, perhaps. I don't know if
EAC works with Wine, but it would be worth inve
Im not sure if Max with cdParanoia is as good as EAC but I believe its
> the best we Mac users have.
I am sure you know of this options, but for those that don't, I have
been using EAC with AccurateRip on my Mac under VMWare Fusion and it
works fl
signal. Starting to make sense?
Audioquest loathes distortion. You'll love Audioquest.
Brought to you by Audioquest, the people that absolutely, positively,
don't have a f*%king clue. :)
--
Apparition
Appariti
we do a double blind test, all you have is
opinion. Some are better educated than others, however.
--
Apparition
Apparition's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/m
alekz;258639 Wrote:
> Apparition, you misunderstood my post. I'm not talking about digital
> domain. I'm talking about cables introducing ground loops and noise
> into the analogue signal via RFI, shared ground, etc.
No, I got you, I just don't believe it. Not even
that the notion is complete
nonsense. Again, I am not putting it that way to be offensive but to
put doubt to rest for anybody that is remotely open minded about this
(ie. everybody who is just wondering, and doesn't think CAT6 will soun
same. You
may get more packet loss, for a variety of reasons including a weak
signal or congested frequencies, but a packet received and checksummed
is good. Period. Always.
--
Apparition
Apparition's Profile: http://f
