Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Heresy

2007-11-28 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting pablolie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Shredder;245838 Wrote: > > OK. Makes sense re: the sound card. > > > > Perhaps, I should change the scenario. Other than the ability to use a > > NAS, why do I need a Slim Devices product if I can stream music > > directly from my PC to a DAC? > > The

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Heresy

2007-11-28 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting Shredder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Mark. You may have hit on the answer to my question. > > In reading about NAS devices, I thought I had been told that I could > run ethernet cable directly from the NAS to a router and then from the > router either wirelessly or with ethernet to the Tran

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Heresy

2007-11-28 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting Shredder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > While I am very excited by the idea of the Slim Device products, it has > occurred to me that I may not really need one. It has occurred to me > that I could accomplish the same end by putting my music on a NAS > device, connecting the NAS directly to a DAC,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] From I-Tunes (or any other store) to Music Collection... Best Practises?

2007-10-08 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting pablolie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > bhaagensen;233589 Wrote: > > ... it does make sense to use flac (or any other loseless compression > > format). That is the only way you would be able to obtain the same > > quality as you started out with ... > > > > I would contend I do use the most

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] So, this new iPod Touch thing

2007-09-08 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting Balthazar_B ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > DCtoDaylight;225936 Wrote: > > Ya but I'm and audiophile AND a techno dweeb! I want my cake and to eat > > it too! > > > > Your point is certainly valid, even the 160 gig Classic won't hold > > everything unless I convert it to lossy compression. I

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] So, this new iPod Touch thing

2007-09-05 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting ezkcdude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Ok, it's an iPod with the iPhone interface. Cool, but not earth > shattering news. Oh, wait, what's that? It also is a wi-fi enabled web > browser? So, I can use it with the Nokia skin to control SlimServer? > Now, that may be something to write home abou

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Different servers sound different

2007-05-18 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting ceejay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > IMHO the most likely explanation for any difference between different > server installations would be if some configuration difference had > accidentally crept in while installing - perhaps different volume or > preamp settings, or file format transcodiing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-01 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting willyhoops ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > yea i know everyone is against drm but thatÂ’s because drm today sucks > today, Here's where your argument breaks down, right in the beginning. There are many people opposed to DRM for far more reasons that 'it sucks today.' I am opposed to it because

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Need to brighten sound of new SB3 --> Transporter or DAC?

2007-01-11 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting desertrat58 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Sorry for the long post, but it is the synthesis of much perusal of this > forum, along with SB info available on Audio Circle, Head-Fi and Audio > Asylum forums. (My Asylum moniker is "activeM&Kman"). > > I'm a new SB3 owner, and the WiFi server conc