The end of speculations is over. Now you can ask Bob yourself. (Almost)
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f8-general-forum/your-chance-ask-bob-stuart-anything-about-mqa-27412/
R1200CL's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.co
Not lately :D
And I've stopped purchase HD tracks, as I found it strange they could
sell me hi res of recordings that most likely never was recorded i more
than 16/44.1.
I have a Norah Jones that I find quite nice.
(And as said, I have very few HD-tracks).
If I could purchase Adele 25 in hi-re
To me the possibility to stream hi-res is the main advantage with MQA.
You may say that could be done without MQA, but since it's only is going
to be offered via MQA, I'm fine with that.
I'm more skeptical to the sonic benefits of older 16 bit material that
do not exist in better master than the
ralphpnj wrote:
>
> I liked your analysis but I still have one very important and, as yet
> unanswered, question: does MQA work with DSD files?
It has been stated from MQA that DSD is not part of the MQA chain.
You may ask PS Audio if their DAC's will be MQA enabled some time
😀
