I'd expect that a 96 khz FLAC converted to 320 kbps mp3 might sound even
better than converted to an 48 khz FLAC, but I never tried. Thus 320
kbps mp3 might be an option to play your HD audio files on an SB3.
--
kai
kai's
kai wrote:
I'd expect that a 96 khz FLAC converted to 320 kbps mp3 might sound even
better than converted to an 48 khz FLAC, but I never tried. Thus 320
kbps mp3 might be an option to play your HD audio files on an SB3.
Er, why?
R.
___
audiophiles
kai;263999 Wrote:
I'd expect that a 96 khz FLAC converted to 320 kbps mp3 might sound even
better than converted to an 48 khz FLAC, but I never tried. Thus 320
kbps mp3 might be an option to play your HD audio files on an SB3.
This is about as unlikely as things get...but please try it and
You're probably right. I forgot that good old mp3 - unlike newer lossy
codecs - only supports sampling rates up to 48 khz.
--
kai
kai's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6608
View this thread:
Gibson78;261974 Wrote:
Opinions are solicited on whether streaming uncompressed files into an
SB3 fed via its analog outs into an Onkyo A-9555 2 channel amp into a
pair of Aperion 633-T tower speakers (all budget but good stereo stuff)
would really sound different than, say, 320 kbps mp3s.
Robin Bowes;262013 Wrote:
Gibson78 wrote:
Opinions are solicited on whether streaming uncompressed files into
an
SB3 fed via its analog outs into an Onkyo A-9555 2 channel amp into
a
pair of Aperion 633-T tower speakers (all budget but good stereo
stuff)
would really sound different
Gibson78 wrote:
Opinions are solicited on whether streaming uncompressed files into an
SB3 fed via its analog outs into an Onkyo A-9555 2 channel amp into a
pair of Aperion 633-T tower speakers (all budget but good stereo stuff)
would really sound different than, say, 320 kbps mp3s. My guess
Gibson78;261974 Wrote:
Opinions are solicited on whether streaming uncompressed files into an
SB3 fed via its analog outs into an Onkyo A-9555 2 channel amp into a
pair of Aperion 633-T tower speakers (all budget but good stereo stuff)
would really sound different than, say, 320 kbps mp3s.
opaqueice;262052 Wrote:
It's pretty tough to tell the difference between 320 MP3 and
uncompressed on any gear. In my experience being able to do so has
much more to do with knowing what MP3 compression artifacts sound like
and choosing passages the encoder has difficulty with than anything
Opinions are solicited on whether streaming uncompressed files into an
SB3 fed via its analog outs into an Onkyo A-9555 2 channel amp into a
pair of Aperion 633-T tower speakers (all budget but good stereo stuff)
would really sound different than, say, 320 kbps mp3s. My guess (and I
will
10 matches
Mail list logo
