Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 24/96k

2008-11-08 Thread Oeelidu84
#12288;An applicant was filling out a job application. When he came to the question, Have you ever been arrested? hewrote, No.#12288;#12288;The next question, intended for people who had answered in the affirmative to the previous question, was Why?#12288;#12288;The applicant answered it anyway:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 24/96k

2008-10-21 Thread dennis55
Tried a couple of 24/96khz Flac files from this site on the Transporter and was most impressed!. swapping between 44.1 and 96 is an eye/ear opener see what you think dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- dennis55 dennis55's

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 24/96k

2008-10-21 Thread Phil Leigh
Dennis - try taking the files down to 44.1/24 or 48/24 and compare - see what you think. Regards Phil -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann JISCO/UPCI - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 24/96k

2008-10-21 Thread Themis
dennis55;351819 Wrote: Tried a couple of 24/96khz Flac files from this site on the Transporter and was most impressed!. swapping between 44.1 and 96 is an eye/ear opener see what you think dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s not a lot of a difference with modern (upsampling) dacs, but I