Review of the NAD, none too impressive.
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/nad-c658-streaming-dac-review.12090/
sparkyuk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=70716
View this th
I very highly and intensely recommend Dirac room optimization. IMO it is
*the* top breakthrough in optimizing system performance of the last 20
years.
...pablo
Server: Win10 and LMS 8.2.0
System: SB Touch --optical->- Benchmark DAC2HGC --AnalysisPlus Oval
Copper XLR->- NAD M22 Power Amp --Anal
I'm living in a small room with hard walls therefore the bass is my
problem. Using a Behringer ECM8000 microphone an 'REW'
(http://www.roomeqwizard.com/) I measured the plain sound (green). Then
I buildt a room correction with parametric equalizers in Moodeaudio an
measured again (red). Listening
Room EQ Wizard and SoX are also a good option, you need a calibrated mic
(like a miniDSP mic) but no other hardware.
BoxOfCables's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=72091
View this thread: http://for
> Am 30.11.2021 um 15:14 schrieb beneix
> :
> Thanks - I'll think about it. Here in Europe the price of the SHD is on
> par with the NAD. The SHD doesn't seem to have 12V trigger output for my
> power amplifier, and the NAD has a built-in streamer, so that may sway
> the choice.
If you or anyone
chrissy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The shd has 4 balanced outputs and replaces your preamp. This should
> work fine.
> Greets
> Christian
Thanks - I'll think about it. Here in Europe the price of the SHD is on
par with the NAD. The SHD doesn't seem to have 12V trigger output for my
power amplifier, and
Hi,
The shd has 4 balanced outputs and replaces your preamp. This should
work fine.
Greets
Christian
Raspi 4 as server for various things besides lms
Raspi 3 feeding a SPL Phonitor xe for headphones
Minidsp shd running squeezelite feeding a poweramp and a pair of Nubert
nuvero 70 and 2 elac
chrissy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I habe no experience with NAD, but use the minidsp shd including Dirac
> for some time now. Dirac is great and improved my system drastically. I
> would consider buying an shd and a separate power Amp. This could not
> only be cheaper than the NAD but be more flexible t
schoeppi wrote:
>
> Sorry, I have no experience with NAD and I didn't use equalizers, but
> using
> DSP was the biggest improvement in sound I had after tweaking room
> acoustic. I do not like listen without DSP anymore :-).
>
> I have a MiniDSP Studio with a squeezelite running on it and th
Hi,
I habe no experience with NAD, but use the minidsp shd including Dirac
for some time now. Dirac is great and improved my system drastically. I
would consider buying an shd and a separate power Amp. This could not
only be cheaper than the NAD but be more flexible than having an all in
one box
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:00:02AM +, beneix wrote:
>
>Does anyone have experience of using either the NAD C 658, or the Dirac
>algorithms (I believe they are built into equipment from several other
>manufacturers)? Does it work? Do you get the desired effect (a more
>perfect in-room frequency
I have the opportunity to purchase a 'NAD C 658'
(https://nadelectronics.com/product/c-658-bluos-streaming-dac/) at a
decent price. It has a digital room correction circuit built-in.
I have always been a bit conservative and strived for "pure path" HiFi
(my current amp doesn't even have tone con
12 matches
Mail list logo
