Julf wrote:
> Ah, but how about my pet bat Eric? :)
He's going to hate you
LMS 7.7.5 - 5xRadio, 3xBoom, 4xDuet, 1xTouch, 1 SB2. Sonos 2xPLAY:1,
PLAY:3, PLAY:5, Marantz NR1603, JBL OnBeat, XBMC, Foobar2000, XBoxOne,
JRiver 21, Chromecast Audio, Chromecast v1, Pi B2, Pi B+, 2xPi A+,
Odroid-C1,
I got a few 24/44 flac files from warp records, that's about it for
"hires".
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106621
As being suckered in by the original hirez campaign and having a lot of
DVDA a think it's correct to say that 50% is fake and probably more so
with the more popular SACD format .
I did buy a lot AIX/itrax releases these are actual hirez recordings.
I see the marketing angle here they recording
Jeff07971 wrote:
> Its not really the same conversation really, I do not say that the way
> the 0's and 1's are "shipped" makes any difference.
>
> I am however saying maybe higher sample rates and possibly bit depth
> would be more sensible despite what the average person may hear.
>
Oh, that
Jeff07971 wrote:
> I couln't find anything pertinent I did have a fair google !
>
> The only thing I found was that my copy was one of the rarer ones (SONY
> one)
>
> I'll have to find it and Ebay ! :)
>
> Edit: And WOW if that was from a 1973 master !!!
I have a modest collection (about 2,00
Jeff07971 wrote:
> The commonly held belief (and entirely reasonable) is that we can only
> "hear" up to 17 (or so) Khz the 22 Khz (or so) limit is only about 1/4
> octave or 25% "safety" factor against the average.
>
> I wouldn't want to use a safety rope with 125% breaking strain on the
> aver
> Headhunters 1973 or earlier. I googled on stuff like "title" + release
> date.
I couln't find anything pertinent I did have a fair google !
The only thing I found was that my copy was one of the rarer ones (SONY
one)
I'll have to find it and Ebay ! :)
*Players:* SliMP3,Squeezebox3 x3,Recei
Julf wrote:
> Clearly we are. Happy to continue in whichever thread you want.
Its not really the same conversation really, I do not say that the way
the 0's and 1's are "shipped" makes any difference.
I am however saying maybe higher sample rates and possibly bit depth
would be more sensible de
Jeff07971 wrote:
> I did not know that
>
> I only bought 2 SACD's Pink Floyd "The Wall" and Hebie Hancock
> Headhunters.
>
The Wall was originally recorded in 1979 or earlier and Headhunters
1973 or earlier. I googled on stuff like "title" + release date.
Both have solidly low resolution pr
> Do you know of any? Did you know yourself?
I did not know that
I only bought 2 SACD's Pink Floyd "The Wall" and Herbie Hancock
"Headhunters"
I thought Headhunters SACD sounded way better than CD, Is there any
information as to what SACD's were from 16/44 and was this one of them ?
*Players
Julf wrote:
> The Oohashi research has pretty much been discredited, mainly because it
> "originates with a single research group whose results contain some
> contradictions and whose results have apparently never been
> independently reproduced". On the other hand, there is ample
> reproducible
Jeff07971 wrote:
> From wiki so it may be rubbish:-
>
>
>
> Isn't this the ultimate DBT ? Even the subject didn't know they were
> reacting ! :)
The ultimate DBT was the release and distribution of DVD-A and SACD. It
was ultimately found that about half the first 5 or more years of
released
My thoughts.
Only closely miced apply ultrasound is rapidly damped in air.
The 20kHz is welll established due to the mechanical "design" of our ear
, exceptions is extremely rare .
HF hearing starts to detoriate when we are kids and dont get better.
And the extrme ends of our range 20 and 20kh
drmatt wrote:
> (Hmm. Are we having the same conversation in two threads?! :) )
Clearly we are. Happy to continue in whichever thread you want.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge th
"shipping files"? Really?
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106621
___
au
drmatt wrote:
> So what about we avoid the resampling step to 44/16 and just start
> shipping the digital masters in 96/24 or whatever they are? Why would
> anyone object?
Most of them seem to be 48/24. 95% of music buyers would probably object
to having to pay the extra cost of shipping files t
So what about we avoid the resampling step to 44/16 and just start
shipping the digital masters in 96/24 or whatever they are? Why would
anyone object?
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=594
philippe_44 wrote:
> Your hearing has a lowpass filter <20KHz.
Ah, but how about my pet bat Eric? :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch,
Jeff07971 wrote:
> After an "interesting" :) discussion here regarding bandwidth and sample
> depth/rates in digital audio I found this interesting :-
>
> http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~boyk/spectra/spectra.htm
I'm not sure anybody claims that such instruments do not produce >20KHz
sound, like som
Jeff07971 wrote:
> Isn't this the ultimate DBT ? Even the subject didn't know they were
> reacting ! :)
Yes - and if other researchers can reproduce and verify the results, it
would definitely be interesting, but until that happens, I am afraid it
has to be filed away in the "cold fusion" catego
Julf wrote:
> The Oohashi research has pretty much been discredited, mainly because it
> "originates with a single research group whose results contain some
> contradictions and whose results have apparently never been
> independently reproduced". On the other hand, there is ample
> reproducible
Jeff07971 wrote:
> However there is reference http://jn.physiology.org/content/83/6/3548
> which seems to suggest that our brains are affected by signals outside
> the 20Khz window even if we can't "hear" them
The Oohashi research has pretty much been discredited, mainly because it
"originates w
arnyk wrote:
> I had this article in mind when I mentioned the Harman Mute Trumpet in a
> previous post. The thing to remember that the world is full of all sorts
> of noises that our ears and brains are blissfully unaware of, and that
> keeps our minds focused on the important things.
I thought
Wombat wrote:
> I have an old thread with people argue about several aspects of what
> golden ears believe to be important. Please take some time to follow the
> man posting as jj.
> http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=85&sid=ebf649f5fd9a63defdacc7c60d6acb1c
That articleis based on
arnyk wrote:
> The thing to remember that the world is full of all sorts of noises that
> our ears and brains are blissfully unaware of, and that keeps our minds
> focused on the important things.
We have a fair number of bats living in the neighbourhood, and while
their chatter might be interes
I have an old thread with people argue about several aspects of what
golden ears believe to be important. Please take some time to follow the
man posting as jj.
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=85&sid=ebf649f5fd9a63defdacc7c60d6acb1c
Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde A
Jeff07971 wrote:
> After an "interesting" :) discussion here regarding bandwidth and sample
> depth/rates in digital audio I found this interesting :-
>
> http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~boyk/spectra/spectra.htm
I had this article in mind when I mentioned the Harman Mute Trumpet in a
previous post.
After an "interesting" :) discussion here regarding bandwidth and sample
depth/rates in digital audio I found this interesting :-
http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~boyk/spectra/spectra.htm
*Players:* SliMP3,Squeezebox3 x3,Receiver,SqueezePlayer,PiCorePlayer
x3,Wandboard
*Server:* LMS Version: 7.9.0
28 matches
Mail list logo
