Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAD 3020 variants

2007-07-08 Thread swhite58
swhite58;211713 Wrote: Funny you should say that - now I'm bidding for a 3140 A NAD C320BEE was also on ebay. My wife, uncharacteristically, suggested that I spend the extra money on a better amp, so I did :) -- swhite58 Clark Connect Linux file server-SB3-NAD C320BEE-Gale 3020/Sennheiser

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAD 3020 variants

2007-06-30 Thread david68
swhite58;211519 Wrote: I'm looking for a cheap used amp to replace my aging (and dying) Luxman L4. I don't want to spend much money as I'm saving up to buy myself some more serious gear for my 50th birthday next year. I thought what about an old NAD? Currently, there are three different

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAD 3020 variants

2007-06-30 Thread zanash
the sonic t is not up with the 3020b in power terms but it has imaging to die for ..if you have 100 db sensitiviety speakers you could give it a go...if not the nads great ...I've got both -- zanash zanash's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAD 3020 variants

2007-06-30 Thread swhite58
david68;211678 Wrote: Why don't you look at the 3130's as well. Very similar presentation to the 3020, but with a little more power. I believe they were very highly thought of too. Funny you should say that - now I'm bidding for a 3140 -- swhite58 Clark Connect Linux file

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAD 3020 variants

2007-06-29 Thread swhite58
killie99;211529 Wrote: The 3020B was by far the best of the 3020 series, I had one for years and now my friend has it as his main amp - I bought mine in 1983! Pity the 3020B isn't one of the ones for sale. Of course, I could always just get a T-amp :) -- swhite58 Clark Connect Linux file