The longer it is left; the more people will have bought. Therefore,
that's more wrath - not less.
I say earlier is better.
--
ncpl
ncpl's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6305
View this thread:
ncpl;154642 Wrote:
The longer it is left; the more people will have bought. Therefore,
that's more wrath - not less.
I say earlier is better.
If i were sean and i hear this i will NEVER make it.
--
Konig
Konig's
but i doubt they will make it anytime soon. They risk incurring the
wrath of those folks who forked out cash early.
--
Konig
Konig's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8490
View this thread:
count me in too! I only need the digital version!
--
ackcheng
ackcheng's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=133
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29494
tomjtx;153547 Wrote:
I think my TP sounds great. Everyday I like it more.
I'll have to second this. Whatever the reason, my Transporter just
seems to sound better and better. I have a lot of trouble turning it
off at night to go to bed.
It really does beat the pants off my old set up of linear
tomjtx;153547 Wrote:
I think my TP sounds great. It's got 3 weeks constant play now I think
it's as good or better than the Lavry. Everyday I like it more.
+1 !
If you read french, i've posted a little listening review of my
Transporter vs my SB3. It's here :
Thanks Gary. I'd forgotten that there was a differential for the
difference in DAC's.
I'm thinking of making a change to get the most from this setup (big
DSP's as you know from t'other forum).
I seem to recall you're going down the T+ route. Are you still using
the SB+ currently?
cheers
krochat;153240 Wrote:
To answer this question - as far as I can tell there are a grand total
of three manufacturers of properly designed DACs - Lavry, Benchmark,
and the higher-end Dodsons. I'm pretty sure that there are lots of
folks who own DACs that aren't properly designed - I'm one of
rajacat;153476 Wrote:
So are you saying there only 3 properly designed dacs? If all you read
is this forum I can understand how you have come to that, IMO, mistaken
opinion.
Raja
I thought he was being sarcastic. If not, I agree it's a mistake to
claim there are any properly designed
ezkcdude;153480 Wrote:
I thought he was being sarcastic. If not, I agree it's a mistake to
claim there are any properly designed DAC's.
Yeah, he must speaking sarcastically. Sometimes the praise of the
almighty Lavry gets a little thick here.
Raja
--
rajacat
ncpl;153471 Wrote:
Thanks Gary. I'd forgotten that there was a differential for the
difference in DAC's.
I'm thinking of making a change to get the most from this setup (big
DSP's as you know from t'other forum).
I seem to recall you're going down the T+ route. Are you still using
I think my TP sounds great. It's got 3 weeks constant play now I think
it's as good or better than the Lavry. Everyday I like it more.
I'm auditioning a Bolder SB/UltimatePS etc. in about a week and will
post impressions then.
--
tomjtx
tomjtx;153547 Wrote:
I think my TP sounds great. It's got 3 weeks constant play now I think
it's as good or better than the Lavry. Everyday I like it more.
I'm auditioning a Bolder SB/UltimatePS etc. in about a week and will
post impressions then.
That's great that you arranged an audition
I'd like one too
--
SoftwireEngineer
SoftwireEngineer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7000
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29494
And what exactly is wrong with using a SqueezeBox as a digital
front-end? And please don't tell me it's because someone on the forum
said it's not good enough. I can sense that is the answer.
--
ezkcdude
DIY projects page:
http://www.ezdiyaudio.com
System:
SB3-EZDAC-MIT Terminator 2
timmorris;153216 Wrote:
I use a Meridian G68 so really don't want to shell out for the analogue
stages. Although I'm sure they are excellent, going from D-A-D-A is
bound to have some influence on the sound.
I really like the idea of the Transporter, but I'd like to buy it
without the
krochat;153236 Wrote:
1. It sounds worse with some systems (i.e., TacT gear) than a better
digital source - be it a SB3 with modified digital out, SB3 with a
separate processor (like the Apogee Big Ben), or a digital-only
Transporter.
2. Maybe I want the Transporter knob.
3. Maybe I
Coffee;153234 Wrote:
If the DAC is designed properly, it should use its own clock to resample
the input. In that case the SB3 would be a perfect (as in cannot be
better) source. Why would a Transporter be better in that case? Better
buttons?
To answer this question - as far as I can tell
krochat;153236 Wrote:
2. Maybe I want the Transporter knob.
3. Maybe I want the dual displays.
4. Maybe I don't want a separate linear power supply.
5. Maybe I find the Transporter form factor more attractive.
For my personal wish list, I'd like a digital-only Transporter without
Nick
The SB+ with the standard DAC rather than the upgraded DAC (which is
redundant for your purpose) is £800, quite a saving on the UK price of
the Transporter.
Regards
Gary
--
GaryG
GaryG's Profile:
20 matches
Mail list logo
