Hi, I am also looking at the DRA-395, I am currently using a Denon avr
w/ the optical to squeezebox v.2. Moving to an analog DRA-395 is a
concern,using only the analog. Should I worry or upgrade to another avr
with optical? Does this concern you?
--
dmarshal
For those wondering about making b-stock purchaces, I have some
first-hand experience to relate.
I went ahead and purchased a DENON DRA-395 from SecondAct.biz, one of
DENON's authorized distributors of b-stock and reconditioned items.
Mine was b-stock, which means it could have been a dealer
joncourage Wrote:
have you considered the Outlaw rr250?
I did consider that one -- and if someone gave me one for Christmas --
I'd keep it! But it's perpetually (and bizarrely) on backorder.
Anyway, I feel guilty about spending money on stereo stuff right now. I
can get a B-stock Denon for
I like the fact that it's stereo :-) Here's a nice review:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/frr.pl?ramps1080742540openflup114#11
The last reply was interesting, comparing the Denon to some older
receivers.
--
Skunk
Skunk Wrote:
I like the fact that it's stereo :-) Here's a nice review:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/frr.pl?ramps1080742540openflup114#11
The last reply was interesting, comparing the Denon to some older
receivers.
Yeah, I saw that one. At this point, I'm willing to sacrifice a little
Here was my sub out jack when using the Sonic Impact t-amp:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=105051postcount=17
I figure it's about as non-audiophile as you can get! It seemed to work
ok with the sub level being controlled by SB remote, but I'm sure the
DENON would be more ideal.
Skunk Wrote:
Here was my sub out jack when using the Sonic Impact t-amp:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=105051postcount=17
I figure it's about as non-audiophile as you can get! It seemed to work
ok with the sub level being controlled by SB remote, but I'm sure the
DENON
? - I'd have said that y's are good for joining (especially in this
case) - they are less good for splitting - especially if the two pieces
of equipment have different impedance characteristics etc...they'll
interact in subtle ways...you really need some kind of a pad (active or
passive) to
Phil Leigh Wrote:
? - I'd have said that y's are good for joining (especially in this
case) - they are less good for splitting - especially if the two pieces
of equipment have different impedance characteristics etc...they'll
interact in subtle ways...you really need some kind of a pad
Phil Leigh wrote:
? - I'd have said that y's are good for joining (especially in this
case) - they are less good for splitting - especially if the two pieces
of equipment have different impedance characteristics etc...they'll
interact in subtle ways...you really need some kind of a pad (active
have you considered the Outlaw rr250?
--
joncourage
SlimServer Version: 6.5b1 - 6939 - Windows XP - EN - cp1252
Player Firmware Version: 41
SB3 Audio Note DAC 3.1x Sig Levinson 383 integrated Amphion
Argons
yes - sorry - got confused...of course s-n patch bays used a lot for
multing...(eg ducking)
signals should be combined through a T-pad or similar (wonder how many
mono switches just short the signal lines though...)
--
Phil Leigh
12 matches
Mail list logo
