stevo;153350 Wrote:
Barry
It would be nice to know where you would rank the Transporter in your
review.
regards
Steve
I haven't gotten the Transporter yet. But I have listened to the
Transporter analog out vs the Bolder Modded SB2 analog out at the RMAF,
and to my ears, the Bolder SB2
325xi Wrote:
Guys, could anyone explain me how it works with Bolder super PSU, beyond
the personal SQ impressions?
AFAIK power from PSU goes through additional switching circuitry inside
of SB, leaving no difference if it originally came from Bolder or from
30 cent original PSU...
Thank you for this great post !
I believe this will be an excellent guide for those who are thinking of
buying such a gizmo !
Rote
--
rotebailer
rotebailer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6532
TiredLegs Wrote:
Barry, thanks for the great comparison. Personally, I would have been
most interesting in testing the modded Squeezeboxes against the digital
output of a standard SB3, to understand how big a difference the mods
make. And of course, we'll all be interested in hearing how the
Hello Barry,
congratulations for doing this comparisons seriously and gathering so
much equipment.
But (there's always a but) i would make a little suggestion if you
intend to do this test again in the future, it's that you could use a
much diverse scope of records, i know some you chosed and
95bcwh Wrote:
Tirelegs, I have just received an unmodded SB2 (bought from
Mac-pro.com), it doesn't sound anywhere near the 12 combinations I
mentioned in the review, the unmodded SB2 sounded too lean, less clean,
less extended bass, less dynamic.
Was that through the digital output, or
TiredLegs Wrote:
Was that through the digital output, or analog, or both?
The was referring to the digital out. The analog is of course worse
than the digital out, because when I use digital out, I feel it to the
Tact 2.0S, which gives much better sound than the stock SB2 analog
out.
Hope that
