[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Should I get a Squeezebox?

2006-01-16 Thread P Floding
mlihl Wrote: Hi, I'm one of the weird species called audiophiles ;) Basically I'm interested in the idea of having a music server. Since I already own an expensive battery-powered DAC based on PCM1704K that is fed by a heavily tweaked Cambridge Audio player (upgraded clock, new power

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Should I get a Squeezebox?

2006-01-16 Thread JJZolx
mlihl Wrote: Hi, I'm one of the weird species called audiophiles ;) Basically I'm interested in the idea of having a music server. Since I already own an expensive battery-powered DAC based on PCM1704K that is fed by a heavily tweaked Cambridge Audio player (upgraded clock, new power

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Should I get a Squeezebox?

2006-01-16 Thread Kyle
JJZolx Wrote: ... and the software, as clunky as it is, is more convenient and more flexible than playing individual CDs. That's an understatement. You can sit in your favorite chair and access any CD in your collection. You'll listen to things you'd never have bothered to walk across the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Should I get a Squeezebox?

2006-01-13 Thread notanatheist
Get a Squeezebox because it's fast, simple, and elegant. Lesser players are sluggish, have poorer interfaces, and will leave you wanting especially once you try a Squeezebox. -- notanatheist notanatheist's Profile: