From an Audio standpoint, a SliMP3 may be fine for your bedroom -
depends upon your ears and lots of other factors. But, in addition to
the other negative points already mentioned, the protocol overhead to
the server is much higher.
Maybe try and get hold of an SB2. Functionally identical to an
awy;374869 Wrote:
From an Audio standpoint, a SliMP3 may be fine for your bedroom -
depends upon your ears and lots of other factors. But, in addition to
the other negative points already mentioned, the protocol overhead to
the server is much higher.
Maybe try and get hold of an SB2.
jimi00;373506 Wrote:
performant
IMHO, you just invalidated your post right there. ;-)
--
SuperQ
SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139
View this thread:
Thank you for not making fun of my foreign vocabulary. This is a
worldwide community.
I was trying for the word potent.
SuperQ;373814 Wrote:
IMHO, you just invalidated your post right there. ;-)
--
jimi00
SB3 DIYEDEN SVDAC05 Trends TA10.1 Elac BS243
Slimp3 Trends TA10.1 Q-Acoutics
gsawdy;350094 Wrote:
Well, that was unanimous!. And I think the ideas have merit. I think
this weekend I'll take apart one of my SB3s and see if there is a way
to sandwich the plasterboard between the two halves or to cut down the
back so that the front panel will lie flat on the surface
jimi00;373842 Wrote:
Thank you for not making fun of my foreign vocabulary. This is a
worldwide community.
I was trying for the word potent.
Hah, performant is a made-up manager word. My boss uses it, mostly
we make fun of him for using it. I wasn't trying to offend non-native
english
Now wait a minute. I, for one, do not like the Burr-Brown converters,
which I find too loud and bright for my taste. On the other hand the
Cirrus Logic converters are very smooth. What's more, the Slimp3
display is not as technically performant as the SB3's, but if you like
the retro design, it's
Hi All,
I'm posting this question here because I thought this group might be
best able to answer.
I want to mount a squeeze flush to the wall and the SliMP3 seems like
the best choice. It is small and it appears that the face plate
extends beyond the box that would be recessed into the
Disadvantages of the SliMP3:
#8226; No longer produced, hasn't been since the end of 2003 and I
don't know how often they come up for sale
#8226; No wirless
#8226; MP3 only!
#8226; Uses a Crystal CS4334 DAC, no where near as good as the
Burr-Brown PCM1748E
gsawdy wrote:
Now the $64,000 questionhaving never even seen one of
thesewould the sound quality be lower than the SB3?
Yes.
Get a SB3 or Duet.
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
audiophiles mailing list
The display on the SB3 is far better (graphic) than the slimp3 (text
only).
If you want to wall-mount a squeezebox, I would get the SB3. It's much
better.
--
SuperQ
SuperQ's Profile:
Thanks guys,
Well, that was unanimous!. And I think the ideas have merit. I think
this weekend I'll take apart one of my SB3s and see if there is a way
to sandwich the plasterboard between the two halves or to cut down the
back so that the front panel will lie flat on the surface of the wall.
seanadams;350096 Wrote:
Since there are so many of us, you need to use all y'all.
careful, Sean, you are sounding like a Texan.
--
tomjtx
tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this
13 matches
Mail list logo
