ralphpnj wrote:
> And I really hope that I win a big lottery... but guess what neither one
> is going to happen. Wish it were otherwise but it isn't. The best that
> we can hope for is that the audio world misses the op-ed completely
> because if they do discover it then it will be quoted out of
Archimago wrote:
> Thanks for the article! Interesting read and I really hope the audio
> guys don't quote this out of context...
And I really hope that I win a big lottery... but guess what neither one
is going to happen. Wish it were otherwise but it isn't. The best that
we can hope for is tha
Thanks for the article! Interesting read and I really hope the audio
guys don't quote this out of context...
Yeah, I'll guess by the end of this week it might show up somewhere (so
less than a week). As usual, interpretation will be skewed to support
questionable claims... Probably something abou
Julf wrote:
> And how long before someone mentions quantum physics?
In a picosecond so that only golden eared audiophiles can hear it :)
Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-H
And how long before someone mentions quantum physics?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
---
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/24/opinion/the-case-for-teaching-ignorance.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=opinion-c-col-left-region®ion=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region
The above op-ed piece was published in today's New York Times and makes
for some very interes
