For future reference, synchronous/asynchronous sounds more like a
description for whether the SRC occurs in real-time or is done
beforehand.
I believe you're referring to is an integer or non-integer
"up/down-sampling factor" or "sampling rate conversion factor".
Cheers, Darren
Check it,
I think you'll have a hard time finding a DAC that sounds as good as the
Transporter. Even finding one that's a minuscule better will cost a lot
of money. And no, I don't infer that all pricey equipment necessarily
sounds better or even good at all. I know people who have compared the
philippe_44 wrote:
> synchronous vs asynchronous upsampling does not mean anything. it's a
> transformation in the digital domain and only the precision of the
> arithmetic use could make a difference which is far below anything you
> will hear. Assuming the same precision, you can do it in the
posnos wrote:
> hmm... didnt think I was spouting foofoo here... just asking if I would
> lose any SQ doing upsampling with SOX inside LMS verses an external
> DAC.
>
> Unless you think upsampling is foofoo...or even extermal DAC's
>
> Thanks for the comment anyways.
>
> Peter
synchronous
Apesbrain wrote:
> I'm sorry, after the "Windows Audiophile Edition" thread I guess we're
> all out of gas for this one.
hmm... didnt think I was spouting foofoo here... just asking if I would
lose any SQ doing upsampling with SOX inside LMS verses an external
DAC.
Unless you think upsampling
I'm sorry, after the "Windows Audiophile Edition" thread I guess we're
all out of gas for this one.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread:
I am on a system simplifaction kick at the moment and have been debating
dropping my DAC (Bryston BDA-2)
The DAC does synchronous upsampling to 176.4k or 192k (i.e. has two
paths for 44.1k and 48k based files) noting that all my stuff is 44.1
and I run LMS on LInux.
My simple question is, all
