-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/defa
"Marty Rosenberg":
> >> To export aufs, you need to specify fsid option in your exports. Please
> >> read the manual.
> > Sorry, this seems rather trivial, but I'm still unsure of how to get the
> > fsid of a given file system.
You can set it whatever you like. But it must be unique number.
> >
Hello Torsten,
Torsten Luettgert:
> Now, I frequently get this message "failure bad /proc/mounts 1" and
> find it vaguely unsettling. What does it mean? Need I worry? Is the
> "failure" "bad"? :-) Everything seems to work ok, as far as I can tell.
It is /sbin/mount.aufs that prints this error.
I
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:11:31AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> I've patched a vanilla 2.6.18.8 kernel with this tuesday's release.
>>> Another unionfs --- These options are generated automatically
>>> for 2.6.18.8 [*] Use simplified (fake) nameidata Maximum number of
>>> branches
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/defa
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/defa
Hello,
first, let me thank you for your most excellent aufs. I've switched
from unionfs after Knoppix did, and never looked back (well, except
once, but that bug got corrected very quickly :-) It's really stable,
and it's cool that I can use the same aufs code base for 2.6.16.xx and
2.6.20+ alike.
