Re: aufs working on 2.6.21.1 (x86-64)?

2007-05-17 Thread Michael Creel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Michael Creel: I am attempting to update the kernel of the parallelknoppix64-rc1 live CD to use kernel 2.6.21.1 instead of 2.6.19.7. I updated aufs to yesterday's CVS and compiled the aufs.ko module as normal (make KDIR=/usr/src/linux -f local.mk).

Re: aufs working on 2.6.21.1 (x86-64)?

2007-05-17 Thread sfjro
Michael Creel: Everything seems to go well, but when the CD is booted (actually, I use VMware to boot the image), there is a failure at the point that the aufs filesystem is mounted, leading to a failure bad /proc/mounts 1 message. ::: I am trying this using VMware, and I can't

Re: aufs working on 2.6.21.1 (x86-64)?

2007-05-17 Thread Michael Creel
Sorry, I can't figure out how to do that. There is something that prints to screen, but I don't have time to read it. However, I notice that the latest Sidux test release for amd64 is using kernel 2.6.21.1 with aufs, so I think that the problem I'm seeing may be somewhere other than aufs.

Re: unionctl -- unionfs compatibility

2007-05-17 Thread Ryan Jud Hughes
Oh, okay. It looks like, although both work in unionfs, putting the branch first is the preferred form. I'll change my scripts. Thanks. --Ryan On Thu, 17 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ryan, Ryan Jud Hughes: It seems that aufs's unionctl wants a command like: unionctl