branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Tomas M
Hello, I noticed the rr branch flag in aufs documentaton (eg br:/directory=rr), and I noticed it is used by default for iso9660 and udf filesystems. I'd like to suggest to use it as default for 'squashfs' filesystem as well. If it is already implemented, then I'd like to sugget to update aufs.

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Tomas M
> Second thing, I have a question. I believe that udf filesystem is > 'writable', I think it may be used on DVD-RAM media and may be modified. > But maybe I'm wrong; please verify. I forgot to write the QUESTION at all :) So the question was: "should UDF be automatically marked as =rr?" Because

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread sfjro
Hi, Tomas M: > I'd like to suggest to use it as default for 'squashfs' filesystem as > well. If it is already implemented, then I'd like to sugget to update > aufs.5 man page :) RR is set by default for squashfs, and it is described in the manual. Oh, I've found the manual on the web has a tru

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Tomas M
> Second thing, I have a question. I believe that udf filesystem is > 'writable', I think it may be used on DVD-RAM media and may be modified. > But maybe I'm wrong; please verify. I forgot to write the QUESTION at all :) So the question was: "should UDF be automatically marked as =rr?" Because

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Sep 10 2007 12:55, Tomas M wrote: > >I noticed the rr branch flag in aufs documentaton (eg br:/directory=rr), >and I noticed it is used by default for iso9660 and udf filesystems. > >I'd like to suggest to use it as default for 'squashfs' filesystem as >well. If it is already implemented, the

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Tomas M
> RR is set by default for squashfs, and it is described in the manual. > Oh, I've found the manual on the web has a truncated line. Please try > 'man -l ./aufs.5' on your console. > I will fix the conversion to html. I downloaded aufs from CVS today and I compiled it, then I use 'man -l ./aufs.5

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread sfjro
Tomas M: > I downloaded aufs from CVS today and I compiled it, > then I use 'man -l ./aufs.5' and it shows the following: > > Set by default for a branch whose fs-type is either 'iso9660', 'udf', > > (and here the paragraph ends, no more text) It was caused by a single quotation mark. Sorry. He

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Sep 10 2007 13:24, Tomas M wrote: > > > UDF is writable. That is, as long as you have a writable media... > >So I am not alone who thinks this :) Thank you I do not think. I know it. Jan -- - This SF.net email

aufs CVS + 2.6.23-rc5 + NFSv4 root => BUG

2007-09-10 Thread Jan-Marek Glogowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I'm looking for a solution to get union based fs running on a NFSv4 NFSroot. As unionfs doesn't support NFSv4, I'm trying to get aufs running. Since there had been a change to the vm_operations_struct, compared to the aufs cvs version, I tried to

Re: aufs CVS + 2.6.23-rc5 + NFSv4 root => BUG

2007-09-10 Thread sfjro
Hello Jan-Marek, Jan-Marek Glogowski: > I'm looking for a solution to get union based fs running on a NFSv4 > NFSroot. As unionfs doesn't support NFSv4, I'm trying to get aufs running. ::: > NFSv4 is working ok, as I can copy a file from / to the ausf + NFSv4 > union. The error happens al