Hello,
I noticed the rr branch flag in aufs documentaton (eg br:/directory=rr),
and I noticed it is used by default for iso9660 and udf filesystems.
I'd like to suggest to use it as default for 'squashfs' filesystem as
well. If it is already implemented, then I'd like to sugget to update
aufs.
> Second thing, I have a question. I believe that udf filesystem is
> 'writable', I think it may be used on DVD-RAM media and may be modified.
> But maybe I'm wrong; please verify.
I forgot to write the QUESTION at all :)
So the question was: "should UDF be automatically marked as =rr?"
Because
Hi,
Tomas M:
> I'd like to suggest to use it as default for 'squashfs' filesystem as
> well. If it is already implemented, then I'd like to sugget to update
> aufs.5 man page :)
RR is set by default for squashfs, and it is described in the manual.
Oh, I've found the manual on the web has a tru
> Second thing, I have a question. I believe that udf filesystem is
> 'writable', I think it may be used on DVD-RAM media and may be modified.
> But maybe I'm wrong; please verify.
I forgot to write the QUESTION at all :)
So the question was: "should UDF be automatically marked as =rr?"
Because
On Sep 10 2007 12:55, Tomas M wrote:
>
>I noticed the rr branch flag in aufs documentaton (eg br:/directory=rr),
>and I noticed it is used by default for iso9660 and udf filesystems.
>
>I'd like to suggest to use it as default for 'squashfs' filesystem as
>well. If it is already implemented, the
> RR is set by default for squashfs, and it is described in the manual.
> Oh, I've found the manual on the web has a truncated line. Please try
> 'man -l ./aufs.5' on your console.
> I will fix the conversion to html.
I downloaded aufs from CVS today and I compiled it,
then I use 'man -l ./aufs.5
Tomas M:
> I downloaded aufs from CVS today and I compiled it,
> then I use 'man -l ./aufs.5' and it shows the following:
>
> Set by default for a branch whose fs-type is either 'iso9660', 'udf',
>
> (and here the paragraph ends, no more text)
It was caused by a single quotation mark. Sorry.
He
On Sep 10 2007 13:24, Tomas M wrote:
>
> > UDF is writable. That is, as long as you have a writable media...
>
>So I am not alone who thinks this :) Thank you
I do not think. I know it.
Jan
--
-
This SF.net email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm looking for a solution to get union based fs running on a NFSv4
NFSroot. As unionfs doesn't support NFSv4, I'm trying to get aufs running.
Since there had been a change to the vm_operations_struct, compared to the
aufs cvs version, I tried to
Hello Jan-Marek,
Jan-Marek Glogowski:
> I'm looking for a solution to get union based fs running on a NFSv4
> NFSroot. As unionfs doesn't support NFSv4, I'm trying to get aufs running.
:::
> NFSv4 is working ok, as I can copy a file from / to the ausf + NFSv4
> union. The error happens al
10 matches
Mail list logo