Re: Cannot compile aufs with Ubuntu-7.10 kernel sources

2007-11-27 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Heinrich Rebehn: >> i am unable to compile aufs version 20071105 under Ubuntu 7.10 (Kernel = >> >> 2.6.22 with Ubuntu patches): > > Here is a patch for it. > This patch supports the ubuntu kernel only > (archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux-source-2.6.22/linux-sou

Re: unbounded disk usage for xino file

2007-11-27 Thread Jason Lunz
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:11:41PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Additionary, there is a limitation or specification in tmpfs. > It does not reclaim the inode number, and this behaviour MAY make aufs > to do the same behaviour too. In this case, the file size of xino grows. > Try 'df -i' and 'l

aufs 20071126 crash on SMP

2007-11-27 Thread Jason Lunz
I'm running aufs 20061126 on linux i386 2.6.22.14. The machine I'm using now is a vmware VM with 2 CPUs, but I've also reproduced similar crashes on real x86 hardware with older aufs versions. # mkdir a b u # mount -t tmpfs tmpfs a # mount -t tmpfs tmpfs b # mount

Re: unbounded disk usage for xino file

2007-11-27 Thread sfjro
Jason Lunz: > Interesting. What other choice do I have if I'm using a typical > writable-cow-on-readonly-squashfs sort of embedded setup? How about these? - ramdisk + mke2fs + mount - tmpfs + loopback ext2 fs-image + mount > What about just using noxino? In what situations is xino necessary? Wh

Re: aufs 20071126 crash on SMP

2007-11-27 Thread sfjro
Jason Lunz: > I'm running aufs 20061126 on linux i386 2.6.22.14. The machine I'm using > now is a vmware VM with 2 CPUs, but I've also reproduced similar crashes > on real x86 hardware with older aufs versions. I could reproduce the problem. Give me some time. Junjiro Okajima -

Re: aufs 20071126 crash on SMP

2007-11-27 Thread sfjro
Jason Lunz: > I'm running aufs 20061126 on linux i386 2.6.22.14. The machine I'm using > now is a vmware VM with 2 CPUs, but I've also reproduced similar crashes > on real x86 hardware with older aufs versions. I think it is a race condition in revalidating a dentry. Will you try this patch? Jun