"BRUNO CESAR RIBAS":
> it is replaced =)
>
> I cloned and seems ok!
Thank you very much!
I also confirmed that git pull (retrieve latest changes) works seamlessly.
Sven, Arnaud, and those who have experienced this trouble,
Please try again.
J. R. Okajima
-
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 01:49:09AM +0900, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> > I tired pushing local aufs2-2.6.git to remote aufs2-2.6-test.git. It
> > succeeded except master branch. I pushed again with --force option. Now
> > I am testing aufs2-2.6-test.git by git clone.
> > It will take for
> I tired pushing local aufs2-2.6.git to remote aufs2-2.6-test.git. It
> succeeded except master branch. I pushed again with --force option. Now
> I am testing aufs2-2.6-test.git by git clone.
> It will take for a while (since my connection is slow).
>
> If aufs2-2.6-test.git is ok, then is every
[1]sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
"BRUNO CESAR RIBAS":
Could you try to clone [2]...@git:aufs/aufs2-2.6-test.git (it is a clean kernel
2.6 clone) so you can merge your diferences and branches.
I did cloned aufs2-2.6-test.git, but I don't know how to merge my local
branches.
I *thi
Hi Ed,
Thank you for your advice.
I have few knowledge about git.
Ed W:
> I *think* what you would do in this case (just for reference), is to
> create a new empty repo, then you would fetch locally just the branches
> you cared about from the original repo, then remove the remote repo.
Remo
"BRUNO CESAR RIBAS":
> Could you try to clone g...@git:aufs/aufs2-2.6-test.git (it is a clean kernel
> 2.6 clone) so you can merge your diferences and branches.
I did cloned aufs2-2.6-test.git, but I don't know how to merge my local
branches.
I tired pushing local aufs2-2.6.git to remote aufs2-2
sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I have several development or personal branches in my tree, and they
> should not be published. So I don't think it a good idea to send you
> whole .git/ in my local tree.
>
>
I *think* what you would do in this case (just for reference), is to
create a new
