Tomas M:
> It seems to me that modifying branch permissions (=rw or =ro) can
> reorder the branches. I think this should not happen. Am I right?
>
> Example commands attached (file log.txt)
>
> At line 32, you can see current branch order:
> /tmp/002=rw
> /tmp/empty=rw
> /tmp/001=ro
>
> At line 39
Hi Tomas,
I will gladly join the discussion on LKML.
Actually I did posted several mails to LKML when Miklos, the authour of
overlayfs, asked inclusion and I wrote (to somebody else)
(on 12 June)
Actually overlayfs is union-type-filesystem as aufs, instead of
union-type-mo
Hello,
It seems to me that modifying branch permissions (=rw or =ro) can
reorder the branches. I think this should not happen. Am I right?
Example commands attached (file log.txt)
At line 32, you can see current branch order:
/tmp/002=rw
/tmp/empty=rw
/tmp/001=ro
At line 39, remount(mod) is per
I think what Peter wanted to show you is that some "rather important"
kernel developer actually cares about aufs and wants to ping you
Junjiro as soon as they have some kernel code modifications ready
for overlayfs reconsideration, so you can participate as well
(perhaps in the discussion only, per
