On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:21:47 +0900
sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Forwarding to ML.
> Does anyone on this ML know what the state of Docker and 32bit ARM
> is? An= d for that matter should AuFS run just fine on 32 bit ARM
> architecture?
>
> I'm piecing together a tiny little powerful mic
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:00:33 +0900
sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > Aufs3.16 20141215 should fully supports xattr/ea (including
> > cap/acl), but aufs3.16 20141208 supports partially.
> > Try latest version.
I did, and it seems to work until here (not a full run, but I couldn't
get this far
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 01:11:37 +0900
sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Now I made git-push the new version of aufs which supports XATTR/EA
> including the linux-capability.
> If you are still interested in aufs, try this.
> Note: this new feature is in still testing phase, particulary around
> NF
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:13:21 +0900
sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Here is a draft of a new file
> Documentation/filesystems/aufs/design/06xattr.txt.
> I want you (or anyone) to take a look and send comments back,
> particulary about
> - new branch attrib.
> - the behaviour of getxattr(2) and
Hello Junjiro,
I really treasure your aufs and use it a lot. Now, I hit the following
error with Scientific Linux 7 chroots:
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/sbin/suexec: cpio:
cap_set_file
(here, a httpd was installed inside an aufs tree). This is a known
problem, mostly the Dock
On Fr, 2007-09-21 at 15:09 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ok, so I got my very own bug :-)
> > Good luck finding it!
>
> You might be very lucky enough to buy lotto or something. :-)
> While I was reviewing around the BUG line in your log, I noticed one
> race condition. I am not sure this is
Hello,
I use Fedora 7 on a 64 bit Athlon multicore machine.
aufs version is current (updated the cvs tree yesterday),
the kernel is called 2.6.22.5-76.fc7 - the current fedora kernel.
I think I can reproduce it (always happens at the same stage of my
embedded system build, but I'm not sure if it
On Mo, 2007-04-09 at 14:36 -0700, chris rogers wrote:
> This failure happen's if you spell one of the braches wrong. Make sure spell
> them corrently and are the right path.
>
I found the problem. Apparently, the message appears if
/proc/mounts differs from /etc/mtab. And that did happen
beca
Hello,
first, let me thank you for your most excellent aufs. I've switched
from unionfs after Knoppix did, and never looked back (well, except
once, but that bug got corrected very quickly :-) It's really stable,
and it's cool that I can use the same aufs code base for 2.6.16.xx and
2.6.20+ alike.
