Re: Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-24 Thread sfjro
sf...@users.sourceforge.net: > Thayumanavar, > Your problem may be related to Big Kernel Lock which is removed in > linux-2.6.31 for remount. It means what you pointed out in the first > mail is correct. To traverse i_sb_list, aufs should acquire inode_lock > or another lock. I'll re-read 2.6.31 an

Re: Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-22 Thread sfjro
sf...@users.sourceforge.net: > Thayumanavar Sachithanantham: > > i downloaded the 2.6.27 git with aufs source from aufs.sourcforge.net > > and had been unable to hit the issue so far. i will continue to test > > and provide the info. once i can recreate this issue. Also i am unable > > to recreate

Re: Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-09 Thread sfjro
Thayumanavar Sachithanantham: > i downloaded the 2.6.27 git with aufs source from aufs.sourcforge.net > and had been unable to hit the issue so far. i will continue to test > and provide the info. once i can recreate this issue. Also i am unable > to recreate the issue with the custom kernel. Ok.

Re: Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-09 Thread Thayumanavar Sachithanantham
> I don't understand you well. If you apply the debug patch successfully, > reproduce the problem, and get the debug log, then send me the debug > log. Sorry i meant to say that i have been unable to reproduce the crash with the patch applied. > If suse people manages the kernel source files by GI

Re: Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-08 Thread sfjro
Thayumanavar Sachithanantham: > i tried the patch that you seem to have provided but seem to have been > hit the issue. Once hit the issue i provide the details of the log. I don't understand you well. If you apply the debug patch successfully, reproduce the problem, and get the debug log, then s

Re: Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-07 Thread Thayumanavar Sachithanantham
Hello Okajima, i tried the patch that you seem to have provided but seem to have been hit the issue. Once hit the issue i provide the details of the log. Regarding diff between vanilla and SLES, i believe there is not much significant difference. but i let you know on this later. After branch delet

Re: Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-06 Thread sfjro
Thayumanavar Sachithanantham: > The kernel is 2.6.27.45 SLES kernel with aufs ( recent ver as taken > git for 2.6.27) pulled into it. What is the difference between vanilla linux-2.6.27.45 and SUSE Linux Enterprise Server? Can I get the diff or full source files? If SUSE backports kmemleak, then

Re: Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-06 Thread sfjro
Thayumanavar Sachithanantham: > The kernel is 2.6.27.45 SLES kernel with aufs ( recent ver as taken > git for 2.6.27) pulled into it. How recent is it? For instance, I made some bugfixes recently. Do you think they are related to your problem? 4946ca0 2010-07-21 aufs: bugfix, buffer overrun in a

Fwd: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg.

2010-08-06 Thread Thayumanavar Sachithanantham
adding aufs-users list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Thayumanavar Sachithanantham Date: Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:50 PM Subject: Re: question on branch deletion in aufs - reg. To: sf...@users.sourceforge.net Hello Okajima, I don't have some info that you had requested. Info which