Yair Yarom:
> Thanks, I was hoping to avoid this since it tends to be one of the things you
> forget to remove or forget they are there during an update (but my other
> solution was to mount /sbin using aufs :)).
>From my point of view, I didn't forget them.
But it might be more to make mistake i
Hi,
Thanks, I was hoping to avoid this since it tends to be one of the things you
forget to remove or forget they are there during an update (but my other
solution was to mount /sbin using aufs :)).
Thanks,
Yair.
sf...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
> Hi,
>
> David:
>> Why don't you just w
Hi,
David:
> Why don't you just write a wrapper to the binaries that decides which aufs
> binary version to run according the kernel version?
It seems to be the best way for Yair.
The utilities in aufs1 and aufs2 have some incompatibilities, though the
basic feature is equivalent.
For instance
--
Hi,
I am wondering what will be the effects of using aufs2 kernel with aufs1
binaries/utilities, or aufs1 kernel with aufs2 binaries.
The problem is that we have here a single root filesystem (nfs root) which uses
different kernels. We want to try new kernels but some machines will still boot
f
