Mauricio Faria de Oliveira:
> By generic do you specifically mean the xfstests/tests/generic test-suite,
> or just any filesystem testing tools in general?
Both of them.
> Would you suggest to test more than just the combination of one read-write
> branch on top of a read-only b
Hi,
Thanks for the speedy response.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:10 PM J. R. Okajima <[1]hooanon...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira:
> The aufs support status page [1] mentions 'fully tested' for
latest
> versions, so it seems th
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira:
> The aufs support status page [1] mentions 'fully tested' for latest
> versions, so it seems there is some test suite/tools or procedures/scripts
> for testing it, but I couldn't find those.
There is no public test suite specific to aufs.
The c
Hi,
Is there any test suite/tool for aufs?
I'd like to put some patches to test.
The aufs support status page [1] mentions 'fully tested' for latest
versions, so it seems there is some test suite/tools or
procedures/scripts for testing it, but I couldn't fin
please ignore this.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Dan Kegel:
> I got a bounce, too. Are the bounces benign? Your test message seems
> to have made it to the archives.
For many years, I have got such bounces. I think it is a problem of SF
Mailman's.
J.
It looks like first message bounces and others work fine ... maybe
TM
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Tomas M wrote:
>> My emails to aufs-users mailing list are bouncing back.
>> This is test if it works now. Please igno
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Tomas M wrote:
> My emails to aufs-users mailing list are bouncing back.
> This is test if it works now. Please ignore.
I got a bounce, too. Are the bounces benign? Your test message seems
to have made it to the ar
My emails to aufs-users mailing list are bouncing back.
This is test if it works now. Please ignore.
Tomas M
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to
> How about this message?
> Wrong version!
> aufs3.x, but aufs is aufs3.y.
> See README in detail and try git branch -a.
That would be excellent :)
Thank you
Tomas M
--
Introducing Performance Ce
Tomas M:
> Ah, actually I tried
> git checkout origin/aufs3.10
> which returned just error
> error: pathspec 'origin/aufs3.10' did not match any files
>
> So I thought I have to checkout 3.0.
I see.
The detail is described in README file actually.
(from aufs-util.git:README)
Ah, actually I tried
git checkout origin/aufs3.10
which returned just error
error: pathspec 'origin/aufs3.10' did not match any files
So I thought I have to checkout 3.0.
If you modify the error messages as you suggested, it won't help me.
For example if I get error message that aufs util is for
Hi,
Tomas M:
> while compiling aufs utils for Linux 3.10.9, I get error that aufs is
> for 3.0 and later, but aufs is 3.10-...
For aufs3.10 module, aufs-util.git#aufs3.9 branch is recommended.
If your aufs3.10 module is not so new, please try aufs-util.git#aufs3.2
branch since latest aufs-util.g
Hello,
while compiling aufs utils for Linux 3.10.9, I get error that aufs is
for 3.0 and later, but aufs is 3.10-...
Attached patch fixes that.
Thanks for consideration
Tomas M
a.diff
Description: Binary data
--
Intro
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
15 matches
Mail list logo
