On 21/06/2008, at 5:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though the changes I've sent until now where small, I also
agree with
Loui, when he says the AUR is more in maintenance mode (IIRC there
where
already two attempts for AUR2, though I don't know much about their
current
state).
Bei
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:30:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But, as you already said some source code files of the AUR are not really in
> shape in many ways when it comes to coding standards. The problem, as I see it
> for someone who likes to send a patch, is, that you usually address a
Angel Velásquez writes:
The purpose of my e-mail is to give some recommendations that should be
adopted by everyone, I don't want to be arrogant or force you to do
something without knowing why, so I will explain the reasons behind my
recommendations and then you will probably agree with me.
On 20/06/2008, at 4:22 PM, Simo Leone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:54:29AM +0800, Callan Barrett wrote:
Here's another iteration of this patch, I'm still looking for as much
input as possible but this is basically what I would push to testing
at this point. The script now outputs in a dif
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:54:29AM +0800, Callan Barrett wrote:
> Here's another iteration of this patch, I'm still looking for as much
> input as possible but this is basically what I would push to testing
> at this point. The script now outputs in a different format to be
> parsed and there is so
