Heh, I thought this was applied ages ago. Pushed to testing.
--
Callan Barrett
I'm forwarding this to aur-dev, as it's come up before and I want to
gather current opinions on it. A couple thoughts that come to my mind
are that spam harvesters won't honor robots.txt anyway, and in the past
people sort of agreed that by uploading a pkgbuild, you probably should
have noticed the
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm forwarding this to aur-dev, as it's come up before and I want to
> gather current opinions on it. A couple thoughts that come to my mind
> are that spam harvesters won't honor robots.txt anyway, and in the past
> people sor
I'm still of the opinion that if you don't want spammers getting your
email address you shouldn't have put it on the AUR in the first place,
there's not a lot we can actually do and contributor/maintainer tags
are pretty lax in this respect. We're not telling people they need to
be perfectly format
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:39AM +0800, Callan Barrett wrote:
> I'm still of the opinion that if you don't want spammers getting your
> email address you shouldn't have put it on the AUR in the first place,
> there's not a lot we can actually do and contributor/maintainer tags
> are pretty lax in
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still of the opinion that if you don't want spammers getting your
> email address you shouldn't have put it on the AUR in the first place,
> there's not a lot we can actually do and contributor/maintainer tags
> are pr
