Yes, there's not necessarily a problem here. The wrapper function you
construct would be syntactically valid and would execute fine. (It would
exit whatever shell it's executed in.)
I mention it to point out that you have to be careful regexping through
the source (even the
Originally reported the bug [1] a while ago, but butted heads into it again
recently [2]. Here's my rather small patch to fix the issue.
Note that this would cause the column to stretch out to fit its contents,
possibly breaking layout. However, I felt that to be an adequate compromise
given
