On 03/09/2017 06:58 PM, Nicholas Sielicki via aur-dev wrote:
> About one year ago this change was proposed and committed to limit the height
> of comments on AUR pages. (If you're looking for it in your inbox, this post
> took place on the aur-general list, not on aur-dev.)
>
> I'm posting
On 02/12/2017 11:02 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 16:26:55, Janne Heß via aur-dev wrote:
>> Only one question: Are old requests dismissed? Or will they stay
>> forever? To me, it looks unnecessary to keep them, and I would really
>> appreciate if they were dismissed after
On 02/12/2017 10:17 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 02/12/2017 09:56 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> One of the new features of the upcoming aurweb release is a dashboard
>> which will be displayed in place of the regular home page after login.
>> Right now, it includes
>>
>> * a list of
On 02/12/2017 09:56 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the new features of the upcoming aurweb release is a dashboard
> which will be displayed in place of the regular home page after login.
> Right now, it includes
>
> * a list of flagged packages the logged in user (co-)maintains,
> *
On 01/11/2017 10:33 AM, William Gathoye wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> After having been attributed a few packages as a co-maintainer, I
> realized the AUR web interface was not providing a way to display these
> packages and I need to keep a list by myself.
>
> The UI only provides a way to
On 01/09/2017 10:13 AM, Xyne wrote:
> Doug Newgard wrote:
>
>> This is normal. When packages are deleted, the repo remains; the author's
>> name
>> and email are from their git config, not from the AUR.
>
> I didn't think to check if there was a package in the official repos. I assume
> that is
On 01/04/2017 12:06 AM, Nodiv Byzero via aur-dev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking into FS#51968 - 'Atom feed of package repo have
> non-escaped href' issue.
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/51968?project=2
>
> It looks like it's cgit issue.
>
> So, can somebody confirm current running cgit
On 11/05/2016 04:55 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> I actually wanted to implement this a while ago but deferred it because
> I had problems finding a good UI. The two straightforward options are:
>
> 1. Adjust the maintainer filter such that it also looks for
>co-maintainers... Which would
