We seem to have a fundamentally different conception here. What you
call validate I consider, simply sorting. You even called it
sorting in your first paragraph. There is no validation of information
happening at all. Calling this algorithm validating lends it a false
sense of gravity. It is no
Very cool! Are any of these implementations hosted anywhere?
I have been making an AUR scraper/copier that saves package
meta-information. There is also a web service that provides the data.
I put both the database and webservice here: http://juster.us/aurlite
This scraper saves the AUR data
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri 29 Oct 2010 16:23 -0700, Justin Davis wrote:
Hello aur-dev!
Hello Justin.
My suggestion, which I am willing to write a patch for, is to create a
registration link near the login/password input boxes. When logged
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:31 AM, tuxce tuxce@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I read that aur is in maintenance mode, but I try anyway:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17583
FS#17583 - JSON: enable multiple arguments for info method
Patch also attached to bug report
I tested it on current master git
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Justin Davis jrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello aur-dev!
I have checked out the AUR sources from the code.toofishes.net git
repository and started playing with it. While I was messing around I
