Re: [aur-dev] [PATCH] validate email and fully check existence of it

2012-03-20 Thread Slavi Pantaleev
Contacting the mail server to verify that the mailbox exists seems a little excessive. I think just checking for an MX/A record is good in catching some obviously fake addresses and reliable enough. Maybe we should just stop there. On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Tue

Re: [aur-dev] [PATCH] valid_email :: add dns check

2012-03-19 Thread Slavi Pantaleev
Not sure. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:33:29PM +0200, Slavi Pantaleev wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Lukas Fleischer > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:48:36PM +0100, BlackEagl

Re: [aur-dev] [PATCH] valid_email :: add dns check

2012-03-19 Thread Slavi Pantaleev
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:48:36PM +0100, BlackEagle wrote: > > When an email address is of the correct format check if there is an mx > > record for the domain part. This forces people wanting to trash > > something in aur to use a domain

Re: [aur-dev] epoch fields for packages are completely ignored

2011-06-24 Thread Slavi Pantaleev
ode below :) New patch attached that hopefully fixes all problems discussed until now. On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 08:47:49AM +0300, Slavi Pantaleev wrote: >> From 43edc10872ede698a647805e6b1c798f6a13e8b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> F

[aur-dev] epoch fields for packages are completely ignored

2011-06-23 Thread Slavi Pantaleev
n Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Slavi Pantaleev Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:27:55 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Honor epoch field in PKGBUILD files. The epoch field in PKGBUILD files was completely ignored until now, and the final Version field for the package consisted only of pkgver and pkgrel (exampl