Re: [aur-dev] [PATCH] Fix up valid email function, FS#12269

2008-12-21 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 08:25:42PM +0900, Callan Barrett wrote: > All we're looking for now is an @ in any email address to fix problem with > not being able to have + in addresses and just because I see no advantage to > having any sort of stringent validation > > Signed-off-by: Callan Barrett

[aur-dev] [PATCH] Fix up valid email function, FS#12269

2008-12-21 Thread Callan Barrett
All we're looking for now is an @ in any email address to fix problem with not being able to have + in addresses and just because I see no advantage to having any sort of stringent validation Signed-off-by: Callan Barrett --- web/lib/aur.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 delet