Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't think of a case where
this isn't a good idea and a lot of people complain about it
(stonecrest).
--
Callan Barrett
0002-Umark-out-of-date-on-update.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi Callan,
I think this patch isn't necessary: Packages->OutOfDate is default 0
in the database.
Regards,
Andrea
2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't think of a case where
> this isn't a good idea and a lot of people complain about it
>
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:05 AM, BaSh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Callan,
> I think this patch isn't necessary: Packages->OutOfDate is default 0
> in the database.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea
>
> 2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't
2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:05 AM, BaSh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Callan,
> > I think this patch isn't necessary: Packages->OutOfDate is default 0
> > in the database.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrea
> >
> > 2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <[EMAI
On Mon, 5 May 2008 01:46:11 +0800
"Callan Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't think of a case where
> this isn't a good idea and a lot of people complain about it
> (stonecrest).
Note: Add the condition if pkgrel is unchanged then don't unmark out
