I implemented the base of pkgparse (my Yacc/Lex parser). Currently it
only handles word assignment (and not perfectly yet, values spanning
multiple lines aren't handled). A few more features need to be
implemented before it's really usable (the aforementioned bug, pattern
matching notation and
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Sebastian Nowicki seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Ryan Coyner rcoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Boys,
I've been chatting with Laszlo for a bit. It's very refreshing to see
some
enthusiasm on the subject of AUR2 again. I've been working
Boys,
I've been chatting with Laszlo for a bit. It's very refreshing to see some
enthusiasm on the subject of AUR2 again. I've been working on the Lex/Yacc
parser for the PKGBUILD but it hasn't been touched since May because of a
number of reasons, but this thread has helped spark my
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Callan Barrett wizzomafi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us
wrote:
I started aurman project as a simple frontend for AUR, then I realised
the
new idea later for it to be able to be a backend, api, frontend
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Sebastian Nowicki seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 9:52 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
I think AUR2 would be just a temporary solution for our final purposes. I
started to plan/design quite a few weeks ago the new AUR generation with
Louipc, and we think
On 10/19/2009 04:40 AM, Sebastian Nowicki wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Dave wrote:
Hi all,
I came across a forum post
(http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=80997) discussing how AUR
needs to be improved, which led to the AUR2 wiki page. However, the
last major updates, either
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Sebastian Nowicki seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Dave wrote:
Hmmm, dying project with little to no official support? Count me in! Would
you recommend that your repository be the main repository?
I suppose so. It's the most up-to-date
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us wrote:
I think AUR2 would be just a temporary solution for our final purposes. I
started to plan/design quite a few weeks ago the new AUR generation with
Louipc, and we think of an absolutely new implementation/idea. We would
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Callan Barrett wizzomafi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us wrote:
I think AUR2 would be just a temporary solution for our final purposes. I
started to plan/design quite a few weeks ago the new AUR generation
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Callan Barrett wizzomafi...@gmail.comwrote:
TOP POST
Maybe I'm missing something but wouldn't it be better if you did the
backend first and then worked on the client. Otherwise you need to rewrite
everything in the client and it's just wasted work. Also why
Hi guys,
I've picked up AUR2 development once again, and made it work with
Django 1.0+. I want to start working on binary package support, but
I'm unsure as to how to go about it. The current AUR depends on
background scripts which populate the database. I really don't like
this idea. It's fine
11 matches
Mail list logo
