[aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-06-19 Thread Loui
Hey guys. I'm thinking we should just merge testing into master now. We can test master for a little bit and if it seems like there are no regressions push the new code into the running server. I'm bringing this up because someone has submitted a duplicate of what has been dubbed "The most annoyin

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-06-19 Thread Simo Leone
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:25:20AM -0400, Loui wrote: > Hey guys. I'm thinking we should just merge testing into master now. > We can test master for a little bit and if it seems like there are no > regressions push the new code into the running server. > > I'm bringing this up because someone has

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-06-19 Thread Loui
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:46:48AM -0500, Simo Leone wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:25:20AM -0400, Loui wrote: > > Hey guys. I'm thinking we should just merge testing into master now. > > We can test master for a little bit and if it seems like there are no > > regressions push the new code in

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-06-19 Thread Simo Leone
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:04:13AM -0400, Loui wrote: > > What? Where's the test site? > http://aur.neotuli.net pgpHHfsdL9EQ8.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-06-19 Thread Loui
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:14:39AM -0500, Simo Leone wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:04:13AM -0400, Loui wrote: > > > > What? Where's the test site? > > > http://aur.neotuli.net Oh right. I remember that one now.

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-07-07 Thread Loui
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:46:48AM -0500, Simo Leone wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:25:20AM -0400, Loui wrote: > > Hey guys. I'm thinking we should just merge testing into master now. > > We can test master for a little bit and if it seems like there are no > > regressions push the new code in

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-07-07 Thread Simo Leone
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:10:43AM -0400, Loui wrote: > Alrighty I pushed all of testing to master, changed the version and > tagged it. > > Can you update the test site? If there are no regressions by Monday I > think it'll be OK to set 1.5.2 running on aur.archlinux.org. > Alright, the test si

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-07-07 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2008/7/7 Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:10:43AM -0400, Loui wrote: > Alright, the test site at http://aur.neotuli.net/ has been updated. What > little I played with it, I didn't identify any issues, nice work guys. perfect, good work * guys, can you apply this patch t

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-07-08 Thread Loui
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Simo Leone wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:10:43AM -0400, Loui wrote: > > Alrighty I pushed all of testing to master, changed the version and > > tagged it. > > > > Can you update the test site? If there are no regressions by Monday I > > think it'll b

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-07-28 Thread Simo Leone
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 01:25:20AM -0400, Loui wrote: > Hey guys. I'm thinking we should just merge testing into master now. > We can test master for a little bit and if it seems like there are no > regressions push the new code into the running server. > > I'm bringing this up because someone has

Re: [aur-dev] Considering a 1.5.2 release.

2008-07-28 Thread Callan Barrett
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This has now been deployed. > > -S > WOOHOOO! -- Callan Barrett