Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-11 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 11 Aug 2010 22:23 -0400, Denis Kobozev wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > > On Wed 11 Aug 2010 21:27 -0400, Denis Kobozev wrote: > >> Totally understandable, but I'm not at all interested in maintaining > >> packages. > > > > That's fine. I became a TU under the r

Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-11 Thread Denis Kobozev
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > On Wed 11 Aug 2010 21:27 -0400, Denis Kobozev wrote: >> Totally understandable, but I'm not at all interested in maintaining >> packages. > > That's fine. I became a TU under the role of AUR dev/admin. I have very > few packages. If you were to

Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-11 Thread Loui Chang
On Wed 11 Aug 2010 21:27 -0400, Denis Kobozev wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > > On Tue 10 Aug 2010 07:47 -0400, Denis Kobozev wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > >> > It would be really nice if I could have a partner to work on and > >> >

Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-11 Thread Denis Kobozev
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > On Tue 10 Aug 2010 07:47 -0400, Denis Kobozev wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Loui Chang wrote: >> > It would be really nice if I could have a partner to work on and >> > administer the AUR with, but it seems that no one in the Arch

Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-11 Thread Loui Chang
On Tue 10 Aug 2010 07:47 -0400, Denis Kobozev wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > > What I'd really like to see is people > > running their own AUR, either taking the code or reimplementing it and > > creating custom repos. I'm not sure how realistic such a wish is. > >

Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-10 Thread Denis Kobozev
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > What I'd really like to see is people > running their own AUR, either taking the code or reimplementing it and > creating custom repos. I'm not sure how realistic such a wish is. I always thought that a centralized repository for user-submitted

Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-10 Thread Netanel Shine
Hey, When Loui say he want "What I'd really like to see is people running their own AUR, either taking the code or reimplementing it and creating custom repos." just want to know what the main reason for that? what the advantage ? 2010/8/10 Ng Oon-Ee > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:52 -0400, Loui C

Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-09 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:52 -0400, Loui Chang wrote: > It would be really nice if I could have a partner to work on and > administer the AUR with, but it seems that no one in the Arch community > really has enough initiative or time or expertise. I even feel myself > lacking in those. That or I'm d

Re: [aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-09 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 09 Aug 2010 22:17 -0400, Denis Kobozev wrote: > Loui, > > Could you share your plans about future AUR updates? I realize that > you are probably very busy, have a lot of stuff going on and that > maintaining an open source project is a part-time job that you don't > get paid for. However, I

[aur-dev] Next update of the AUR?

2010-08-09 Thread Denis Kobozev
Loui, Could you share your plans about future AUR updates? I realize that you are probably very busy, have a lot of stuff going on and that maintaining an open source project is a part-time job that you don't get paid for. However, I wish you could be more open about the process. There's really no