On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 at 09:37:56, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> [...]
> What would need to be changed:
>
> * The name of the aur.git repository would become aurweb.git.
>
> * Several references in the AUR(web) source code need to be fixed, the
> header will still refer to the Arch User Repository.
>
Personally, I wasn't aware that bug reports were made for AUR Packages
on Flyspray, but then again, I don't hang out there.
--
Four word witty remark
On Thu 29 Jan 2015 09:37 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Currently, we use the term "AUR" for both the collection of
> user-supplied source packages and the software that helps with accessing
> and modifying these packages which causes quite some misunderstandings.
> Earlier, it was suggested to us
Hi,
Currently, we use the term "AUR" for both the collection of
user-supplied source packages and the software that helps with accessing
and modifying these packages which causes quite some misunderstandings.
Earlier, it was suggested to use "[unsupported]" for the collection of
packages and "AUR"
