On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:38 AM, eliott wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Long time reader, first time poster (in quite a while).
> I was bored today, so I read through some of the mailing list archive. Whew!
>
> Anyway, I had one of those crazy ideas that is, well, crazy. As this
> is the internet and I have s
I'm going to disown a few packages that I'm no longer interested in
maintaining. most of them are up-to-date and work properly, so you don't
have to do any work right away, here's the list:
- empathy
- libtelepathy
- telepathy-mission-control
- desktop-data-model
- hippo-canvas
- online-desktop
-
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:35:56AM +0100, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:18:28 +0100
> > From: Loui Chang
> > Somehow you untagged your PKGBUILD. I just tagged it again. Please
> > upload the .pkg.tar.gz.
> >
> I did so.
Looks like you can adopt it again now.
Ghost1227 wrote:
Callan Barrett wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Ghost1227
wrote:
+1 Great idea! (one of those why didn't that ever occur to me
things)... My
only question is, Allan, if you've been thinking of this for a
while, why
are you hesitating to implement it? And what can we
Callan Barrett wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Ghost1227 wrote:
+1 Great idea! (one of those why didn't that ever occur to me things)... My
only question is, Allan, if you've been thinking of this for a while, why
are you hesitating to implement it? And what can we as TUs do to help
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Ghost1227 wrote:
> +1 Great idea! (one of those why didn't that ever occur to me things)... My
> only question is, Allan, if you've been thinking of this for a while, why
> are you hesitating to implement it? And what can we as TUs do to help see
> this come to fru
Allan McRae wrote:
eliott wrote:
Hello!
Long time reader, first time poster (in quite a while).
I was bored today, so I read through some of the mailing list
archive. Whew!
Anyway, I had one of those crazy ideas that is, well, crazy. As this
is the internet and I have some free time, allow m
I love the idea as well. :)
If it's easy to implement, like Allan pointed out, I say we go for it!
eliott wrote:
Hello!
Long time reader, first time poster (in quite a while).
I was bored today, so I read through some of the mailing list archive. Whew!
Anyway, I had one of those crazy ideas that is, well, crazy. As this
is the internet and I have some free time, allow me to subject you all
t
Huge +1 from me. This would take some work but for all the same
reasons that cactus lists this would be awesome to change to.
If everyone else agrees hopefully we can actually get something going with this.
--
Callan Barrett
Hello!
Long time reader, first time poster (in quite a while).
I was bored today, so I read through some of the mailing list archive. Whew!
Anyway, I had one of those crazy ideas that is, well, crazy. As this
is the internet and I have some free time, allow me to subject you all
to my crazy idea!
-Original Message-
> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:18:28 +0100
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Codeblocks vanished from AUR
> From: Loui Chang
> To: "stefan-husm...@t-online.de" ,
> "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:52:24AM +0100, stefan-husm...@t
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:52:24AM +0100, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
> the package codeblocks I maintain in Community vanished. I am quite sure
> this happened not long ago, maybe yesterday ore the day before. The
> x86_64 package still shows up on Pierre's package list on archlinux.de,
> bu
Le Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:52:24 +0100,
"stefan-husm...@t-online.de" a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> the package codeblocks I maintain in Community vanished. I am quite sure
> this happened not long ago, maybe yesterday ore the day before. The
> x86_64 package still shows up on Pierre's package list on archl
Jonathan Wiersma wrote:
Please remove the following packages from AUR:
freeciv-gtk
eclipse-pdt-integration
eclipse33-xerces
Reasons:
Now that the freeciv in extra is being updated, freeciv-gtk is a
duplicate.
eclipse-pdt-integration is a duplcate of eclipse-pdt since it has been
updated.
ecli
Hello,
the package codeblocks I maintain in Community vanished. I am quite sure
this happened not long ago, maybe yesterday ore the day before. The
x86_64 package still shows up on Pierre's package list on archlinux.de,
but the i686 package does not. Also the AUR comment page is gone.
Now someo
Please remove the following packages from AUR:
freeciv-gtk
eclipse-pdt-integration
eclipse33-xerces
Reasons:
Now that the freeciv in extra is being updated, freeciv-gtk is a duplicate.
eclipse-pdt-integration is a duplcate of eclipse-pdt since it has been
updated.
eclipse33-xerces is included in e
2008/12/21 Bernhard Walle :
> Hi,
>
> please remove the package "capifax" because it's not needed any more.
> "ffgtk" needs "libcapifax" and that needs "libcapi20".
>
>
> Regards,
> Bernhard
>
>
Done.
Hi,
please remove the package "capifax" because it's not needed any more.
"ffgtk" needs "libcapifax" and that needs "libcapi20".
Regards,
Bernhard
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:39:54 -0500
Ghost1227 wrote:
> Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> > marc[î1] wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> why libmtp still in 0.2.6 ?
> >>
> >> 0.3.5 is out !!!
> >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=63386a3d0812210515h6cb35bc8nd70988499bc3f2f4%40mail.gmail.com
> >>
Evangelos Foutras wrote:
marc[î1] wrote:
Hi
why libmtp still in 0.2.6 ?
0.3.5 is out !!!
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=63386a3d0812210515h6cb35bc8nd70988499bc3f2f4%40mail.gmail.com
Because the developers are human beings and their time is limited.
Moreover, 0.3
marc[î1] wrote:
Hi
why libmtp still in 0.2.6 ?
0.3.5 is out !!!
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=63386a3d0812210515h6cb35bc8nd70988499bc3f2f4%40mail.gmail.com
Because the developers are human beings and their time is limited.
Moreover, 0.3.5 was released just today;
Le dimanche 21 décembre 2008, Evangelos Foutras a écrit :
> Jens Maucher wrote:
> > Hi folks
> > libmtp is in [extra]
> > Why is this package in AUR too?
> >
> > Regards
>
> I've removed the package and notified its maintainer.
>
Hi
why libmtp still in 0.2.6 ?
0.3.5 is out !!!
http://sourceforge
Simon Legner wrote:
Hi,
please remove the AUR package »amarok-rc1« since it is outdated.
Thanks in advance!
simon
Done.
Jens Maucher wrote:
Hi folks
libmtp is in [extra]
Why is this package in AUR too?
Regards
I've removed the package and notified its maintainer.
Cheers!
Hi,
please remove the AUR package »amarok-rc1« since it is outdated.
Thanks in advance!
simon
Hi folks
libmtp is in [extra]
Why is this package in AUR too?
Regards
--
Jens 'defcon' Maucher
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
27 matches
Mail list logo
