On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 06:01:32AM +0100, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>
> +1 even if my vote doesnt count.
>
> Cpmments for what?
> Out of date? -> Flag it
> Problem? -> Bug report
> Comments -> Feature request
> Cudos/Anything else -> Send personal email
> Donations -> Paypal
>
> Just like its be
Robin Pedersen wrote:
I submitted a package, digikam-0.10.0rc1, yesterday and today it's not
there.
Was it removed? Why?
This will be because a package with the same name exists in the repos.
Read the rules for submitting packages here:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guideli
I submitted a package, digikam-0.10.0rc1, yesterday and today it's not
there.
Was it removed? Why?
I also submitted kipi-plugins-0.2.0rc1, which is still there.
--
Robin Pedersen
I'm tri170391, maintainer of winff-amd64. I see that the original winff
package is now out-of-date and it's maintainer is not update it for a
while, and it supported i686 only. I've now worked on a PKGBUILD that
works on both architecture and I request TUs to orpan the winff package
so that I c
Hi,
I'd like to remove a package I maintain (ncmpc-tradiaz-svn [1]), since it
was superseded by other package. However, I couldn't find anything in AUR's
interface to delete it, so I had to ask here.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18291
Regards,
--
Ricardo Martins * scarybox.net
On 1/25/09, Ricardo Martins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to remove a package I maintain (ncmpc-tradiaz-svn [1]), since it
> was superseded by other package. However, I couldn't find anything in AUR's
> interface to delete it, so I had to ask here.
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1829
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:21, Ronald van Haren wrote:
> On 1/25/09, Ricardo Martins wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to remove a package I maintain (ncmpc-tradiaz-svn [1]), since it
> > was superseded by other package. However, I couldn't find anything in AUR's
> > interface to delete it, so I had to
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:14:42 +0100, Allan McRae
wrote:
Robin Pedersen wrote:
I submitted a package, digikam-0.10.0rc1, yesterday and today it's not
there.
Was it removed? Why?
This will be because a package with the same name exists in the repos.
Read the rules for submitting packag
Hi guys,
I guess that arch64 repo is broken again.
I checked out the logs located in /var/log/aur and I noticed this error:
Error: cannot access config file (/etc/tupkgs64.conf)
Can someone check out what's wrong?
Thanks.
--
Arch Linux Developer (voidnull)
AUR & Pacman Italian Translations
Mi
Giovanni Scafora wrote:
Hi guys,
I guess that arch64 repo is broken again.
I checked out the logs located in /var/log/aur and I noticed this error:
Error: cannot access config file (/etc/tupkgs64.conf)
Can someone check out what's wrong?
Thanks.
The "missing" file is found at /srv/http/au
2009/1/25, Allan McRae :
> Giovanni Scafora wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I guess that arch64 repo is broken again.
> > I checked out the logs located in /var/log/aur and I noticed this error:
> >
> > Error: cannot access config file (/etc/tupkgs64.conf)
> >
> > Can someone check out what's wrong?
On Freitag 23 Januar 2009 05:54:21 Loui Chang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 03:29:19PM +0100, Lukas Appelhans wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 14 Januar 2009 19:07:54 Loui Chang wrote:
> > > > > On 2009-01-14 15:07:38, Lukas Appelhans wrote:
> > > > > > So, I would like to ask if there is any method to ge
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 05:46:24PM +0700, Tri Nguyen wrote:
> I'm tri170391, maintainer of winff-amd64. I see that the original winff
> package is now out-of-date and it's maintainer is not update it for a while,
> and it supported i686 only. I've now worked on a PKGBUILD that works on both
>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Jaroslav Lichtblau wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 06:01:32AM +0100, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>>
>> +1 even if my vote doesnt count.
>>
>> Cpmments for what?
>> Out of date? -> Flag it
>> Problem? -> Bug report
>> Comments -> Feature request
>> Cudos/Anything els
2009/1/26 Angel Velásquez :
> 2.- The accounts on AUR, Forums, Wiki, Bug tracker should be unique, I
> mean, I have differents accounts with the same login and different
> passwords, in differents parts of the portals,
I've no idea how this might be possible. It'd be nice, but punbb,
flyspray are
15 matches
Mail list logo
