Re: [aur-general] Weird behaviour of the sergej entity

> "Vesa" == writes: Vesa> Nevertheless, why adopt a package that wasn't out-of-date without Vesa> doing anything to it? Especially when you already have more than Vesa> 700? I'm more disturbed by the fact that he is adopting packages which are clearly maintained by others, e.g. see header of

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning Request (twindy)

2009/2/15 M Rawash : > could a TU please orphan "twindy" in AUR, it hasn't been updated since > Jun 2007, i'd like to add a patch that would let it compile with > gcc-4.3, and i'm also working on a patch for x86_64 archs... i have > already contacted the maintainer but didn't get any response yet.

[aur-general] Orphaning Request (twindy)

could a TU please orphan "twindy" in AUR, it hasn't been updated since Jun 2007, i'd like to add a patch that would let it compile with gcc-4.3, and i'm also working on a patch for x86_64 archs... i have already contacted the maintainer but didn't get any response yet. regards M Rawash

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request & abandonded packages

Christoph Zeiler wrote: Could a TU please orphan the two packages uploaded by user karsten in 2007? They haven't been updated since. I'd also like to ask if there's some way to generally orphan all those unattended packages, as there's still quite alot of them. Some nifty script maybe? Done.

[aur-general] Orphaning request & abandonded packages

Could a TU please orphan the two packages uploaded by user karsten in 2007? They haven't been updated since. I'd also like to ask if there's some way to generally orphan all those unattended packages, as there's still quite alot of them. Some nifty script maybe? -- Follow The White Rabyte . . .

Re: [aur-general] mnogosearch not updated from 2006.

Xavier wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> The mnogosearch, is very out-of-date.I created a new PKGBUILD with new >> options. >> >> Can see here http://djgera.pastebin.com/m7f76ff9b (please review it if >> posible, comments are very welcomed)

Re: [aur-general] Weird behaviour of the sergej entity

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> Just noticed that xmobar, which I uploaded on 2009/01/18 to community >> (with all the other ghc-6.10 updates) was just recently adopted by > I believe that when a package is moved to [community],

Re: [aur-general] mnogosearch not updated from 2006.

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Hi > > The mnogosearch, is very out-of-date.I created a new PKGBUILD with new > options. > > Can see here http://djgera.pastebin.com/m7f76ff9b (please review it if > posible, comments are very welcomed) > I don't know anything about

[aur-general] mnogosearch not updated from 2006.

Hi The mnogosearch, is very out-of-date.I created a new PKGBUILD with new options. Can see here http://djgera.pastebin.com/m7f76ff9b (please review it if posible, comments are very welcomed) Any TU can orphan it, and then adopt by me? Thanks. -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.dj

Re: [aur-general] Weird behaviour of the sergej entity

Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote: Hey, Just noticed that xmobar, which I uploaded on 2009/01/18 to community (with all the other ghc-6.10 updates) was just recently adopted by sergej in AUR. Without him doing any changes to the package or uploading a new version. What's up with this, sergej? Are you tryi

[aur-general] Weird behaviour of the sergej entity

Hey, Just noticed that xmobar, which I uploaded on 2009/01/18 to community (with all the other ghc-6.10 updates) was just recently adopted by sergej in AUR. Without him doing any changes to the package or uploading a new version. What's up with this, sergej? Are you trying to get a thousand packa

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:13:56PM +0100, Anders Bergh wrote: > Hi, > > With the news of angvp just resigning... well, I've also thought about > resigning for some time now. I don't really have a lot of time for TU > work because of real life stuff, so I've neglected it too much > recently. That i

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] HTML email will be rejected

On Wednesday 11 February 2009 18:04:09 Aaron Griffin wrote: > I am writing to inform you that I have changed all the Arch lists to > reject HTML formatted email. Please send messages in plain text only. I'm really glad to read this! :)

Re: [aur-general] Remove packages: quarter-svn, q uarter-svn-doc

-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:36:28 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Remove packages: quarter-svn, quarter-svn-doc > From: Michele Mocciola > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Please, remove packages quarter-svn and quarter-svn-doc. Recently the > first stable version was re

[aur-general] Remove packages: quarter-svn, quarter-svn-doc

Please, remove packages quarter-svn and quarter-svn-doc. Recently the first stable version was released and the SVN version is no more necessary. Thanks, Michele M.