-Original Message-
> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:54:48 +0100
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
> From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>
> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> > Please see these packages, it contains a builded packa
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> Please see these packages, it contains a builded packages, binaries and some
> sources.
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4011
>
>
This orphaned package is replaced by
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22284 so it's secure to delete it.
Is list
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> ftgl (old in extra, Orphan)
>
oops here!, the version in extra is a "stable", and in AUR is a "unstable".
Maybe this package need to be renamed to ftgl-beta ?
--
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key f
Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:28:42PM -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>
>> I do not know if this is intentional, but when in doubt I will let you know.
>> I did a comparison of the existence of packages that are
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/{pkgname}/ and also in
>>
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:28:42PM -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> I do not know if this is intentional, but when in doubt I will let you know.
> I did a comparison of the existence of packages that are
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/{pkgname}/ and also in
> community/{category}/{pkgnam
