Hello TUs
Could someone orphan openeuclide [1], please ? The package has been
flagged out-of-date since around november 2006 and never updated. The
program is a little old but with the little patch I produced compiles
and runs fine, so I think I could share.
Regards
Cilyan
[1]
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:10, Cilyan Olowen gak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello TUs
Could someone orphan openeuclide [1], please ? The package has been
flagged out-of-date since around november 2006 and never updated. The
program is a little old but with the little patch I produced compiles
and
Thanks, the package is up-to-date now :)
2009/3/23 Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:10, Cilyan Olowen gak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello TUs
Could someone orphan openeuclide [1], please ? The package has been
flagged out-of-date since around november 2006 and never
On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:00:59 Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Leonardo Damián Barberón
damian...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, my first email to the list!
The maintainer of the pdfjam package hasn't maintained it for more than 3
years now. Please orphan the package
Hi,
please could you delete package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17815
(flashcam). I think this package is already not needed anymore as his function
is provided by current stable version of flash.
Thanks
--
-
Dan Vrátil
prog...@progdansoft.com
ICQ
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:05, Dan Vratil prog...@progdansoft.com wrote:
Hi,
please could you delete package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17815
(flashcam). I think this package is already not needed anymore as his function
is provided by current stable version of flash.
Thanks
Hi TUs,
It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface. You can refresh
your memory here:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html
Allan
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:03:28 +1000
Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi TUs,
It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface. You can
refresh your memory here:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html
Allan
How does one vote for someone to
Well, one has to be a TU to vote, and then it seems that there is a
web interface on AUR that becomes available.
-AT
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:03:28 +1000
Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi TUs,
It is time to vote so head to
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:19:21 -0700
Andrei Thorp gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, one has to be a TU to vote, and then it seems that there is a
web interface on AUR that becomes available.
-AT
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:03:28 +1000
Hi TUs,
The maintainer of the kerneloops package [0] hasn't maintained it for more
than 1 years now. Please orphan the package so that I can maintain it.
[0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14668
Regards
Dami
Done.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leonardo Damián Barberón
damian...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi TUs,
The maintainer of the kerneloops package [0] hasn't maintained it for more
than 1 years now. Please orphan the package so that I can maintain it.
[0]:
On Monday 23 March 2009 16:11:33 Kessia 'even' Pinheiro wrote:
Done.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leonardo Damián Barberón
damian...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi TUs,
The maintainer of the kerneloops package [0] hasn't maintained it for
more than 1 years now. Please orphan the package so
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta abh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/21 Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com:
Thanks! Patches pulled into my any-arch branch.
I think we're good to merge them into master and push them live... do
you see any other issues?
Once this is live,
please remove http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24546 ,
duplicate of http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18188 , and neither
actually build!
Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)
Its already disowned.
greetings
http://www.rastullahs-lockenpracht.de
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:02, Team Pantheon
maintai...@team-pantheon.de wrote:
Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)
Its already disowned.
greetings
http://www.rastullahs-lockenpracht.de
What's wrong with the package itself?
brblockquote class=quote light-black dark-border-colordiv class=quote
light-border-color
div class=quote-author style=font-weight: bold;Daenyth Blank wrote:/div
div class=quote-message shrinkable-quoteOn Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:02, Team
Pantheon
brlt;maintai...@team-pantheon.degt; wrote:
brgt;
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:07, pantheon maintai...@team-pantheon.de wrote:
brblockquote class=quote light-black dark-border-colordiv class=quote
light-border-color
div class=quote-author style=font-weight: bold;Daenyth Blank
wrote:/div
div class=quote-message shrinkable-quoteOn Mon, Mar
I was wondering if it is possible to redirect one package to another,
and if it was possible in unsupported.
For example, python bindings for poppler are currently, but probably
will stay like this, a bazaar repository. The fact is, as it is the
official way of obtaining the software, the package
Cilyan Olowen wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to redirect one package to another,
and if it was possible in unsupported.
For example, python bindings for poppler are currently, but probably
will stay like this, a bazaar repository. The fact is, as it is the
official way of obtaining
21 matches
Mail list logo
