[aur-general] Package deletion request

Hello, I have packages gtk-imajdotat[0], imaj.at[1], imaj.at terminal[2] are obsolete now because imaj.at -image uploading website- is not available anymore. Can you please delete these packages? [0]:http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19610 [1]

Re: [aur-general] Package deletion request

-Original Message- > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:23:45 +0200 > Subject: [aur-general] Package deletion request > From: H.Gökhan SARI > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Hello, > I have packages gtk-imajdotat[0], > imaj.at[1], > imaj.at terminal

[aur-general] python pkging

I am using the example PKGBUILD for python apps, namcap gives that some files are in non-standard dirs, does that matter for python apps. and how do i fix it

Re: [aur-general] python pkging

nathan owe. wrote: I am using the example PKGBUILD for python apps, namcap gives that some files are in non-standard dirs, does that matter for python apps. and how do i fix it it would be usefully if had posted the output of namcap and also the PKGBUILD -- Ionut

Re: [aur-general] python pkging

Biru Ionut wrote: nathan owe. wrote: I am using the example PKGBUILD for python apps, namcap gives that some files are in non-standard dirs, does that matter for python apps. and how do i fix it it would be usefully if had posted the output of namcap and also the PKGBUILD # Contributor: Yo

Re: [aur-general] python pkging

nathan owe. wrote: Biru Ionut wrote: nathan owe. wrote: I am using the example PKGBUILD for python apps, namcap gives that some files are in non-standard dirs, does that matter for python apps. and how do i fix it it would be usefully if had posted the output of namcap and also the PKGBUILD

Re: [aur-general] python pkging

Biru Ionut wrote: nathan owe. wrote: Biru Ionut wrote: nathan owe. wrote: I am using the example PKGBUILD for python apps, namcap gives that some files are in non-standard dirs, does that matter for python apps. and how do i fix it it would be usefully if had posted the output of namcap and

[aur-general] java

this is confusing we need a easier PKGBUILD example for java. here is my pkgbuild so far: /# Contributor: Nathan Owe pkgname=jpartialdownloader pkgver=1.9 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="" license=('GPL') groups=() depends=('openjdk6') makedepends=('openjdk6') source=(http://dow

Re: [aur-general] java

nathan owe. wrote: this is confusing we need a easier PKGBUILD example for java. here is my pkgbuild so far: /# Contributor: Nathan Owe pkgname=jpartialdownloader pkgver=1.9 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="" license=('GPL') groups=() depends=('openjdk6') makedepends=('openjdk6'

[aur-general] first java pkg

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27371 can someone tell me if i did it correctly? namcap says i don't need openjdk6 as a dependency but surely i do since it is a java app

Re: [aur-general] first java pkg

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 19:47, nathan owe. wrote: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27371 > > can someone tell me if i did it correctly? namcap says i don't need openjdk6 > as a dependency but surely i do since it is a java app > Use java-runtime rather than openjdk

Re: [aur-general] first java pkg

Daenyth Blank wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 19:47, nathan owe. wrote: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27371 can someone tell me if i did it correctly? namcap says i don't need openjdk6 as a dependency but surely i do since it is a java app Use java-runtime rather than openj

Re: [aur-general] first java pkg

Daenyth Blank wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 19:47, nathan owe. wrote: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27371 can someone tell me if i did it correctly? namcap says i don't need openjdk6 as a dependency but surely i do since it is a java app Use java-runtime rather than openj

Re: [aur-general] java

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 18:09, nathan owe. wrote: > nathan owe. wrote: >> >> this is confusing we need a easier PKGBUILD example for java. here is my >> pkgbuild so far: >> >> /# Contributor: Nathan Owe >> pkgname=jpartialdownloader >> pkgver=1.9 >> pkgrel=1 >> pkgdesc="" >> arch=('i686' 'x86_64')

Re: [aur-general] python pkging

On 06/17/2009 04:57 PM, nathan owe. wrote: Biru Ionut wrote: nathan owe. wrote: Biru Ionut wrote: nathan owe. wrote: I am using the example PKGBUILD for python apps, namcap gives that some files are in non-standard dirs, does that matter for python apps. and how do i fix it it would be usef