On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Bernard Mentink
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Xavier wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bernard Mentink
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Small point, can you specify the steps on how t
2009/8/26 Bernard Mentink
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Xavier wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Bernard Mentink
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Xavier wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Bernard Mentink
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
>
> I have libjpeg installed just fine in pacman. It seems that chromium
> can not find the lib, maybe it is looking in a different place?
>
> Cheers,
> Bernie
Hi
If your system is up to date, the libjpeg that pacman installs is the
libjpeg.7-1, you can obtain libjpeg.so.62 by installing libjp
Hello,
following the weird titled "AUR webpage" thread (
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/thread.html#5602
) I think the way maintainers handle their packages could have some
things simplified.
I agree that simple updates to PKGBUILDs should be easier.
I've seen many packag
2009/8/26 Nélson «VuDu» Cunha :
> Hello,
> following the weird titled "AUR webpage" thread (
> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/thread.html#5602
> ) I think the way maintainers handle their packages could have some
> things simplified.
>
> I agree that simple updates to PKGB
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:10 PM, pascal wrote:
>
>>
>> I have libjpeg installed just fine in pacman. It seems that chromium
>> can not find the lib, maybe it is looking in a different place?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernie
>
> Hi
>
> If your system is up to date, the libjpeg that pacman installs is the
> l
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:45:56PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
> Besides, with the existing AUR helpers
> [http://www.archlinux.it/wiki/index.php?title=AUR_Helpers] , it should
> make all this very easy :
> - download / extract current package
> - edit pkgbuild
> - run makepkg and namcap
> - makepkg --sou
2009/8/26 Nélson «VuDu» Cunha :
> I agree that simple updates to PKGBUILDs should be easier.
> I've seen many packages with typos in PKGBUILDs, showing that the
> extra workload of having to archive the files and upload them doesn't
> necessary make users test things before uploading. That's all up
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:35 PM, vlad wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:45:56PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> Besides, with the existing AUR helpers
>> [http://www.archlinux.it/wiki/index.php?title=AUR_Helpers] , it should
>> make all this very easy :
>> - download / extract current package
>> - edit p
Sorry, but please don't try to make it sound like I said that because
that's not an argument at all.
Following what I said before, making steps harder isn't necessarily
going to make people walk through them more carefully.
I don't agree that an on-line code editor would make people do more
mistake
Thanks for the link, some sure help.
I just knew a couple of them. ;)
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:53, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:35 PM, vlad wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:45:56PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
>>> Besides, with the existing AUR helpers
>>> [http://www.archlinux.it/wiki/
On 27/ago/09, at 01:35, Nélson «VuDu» Cunha wrote:
Sorry, but please don't try to make it sound like I said that because
that's not an argument at all.
Following what I said before, making steps harder isn't necessarily
going to make people walk through them more carefully.
I don't agree that a
Nélson «VuDu» Cunha wrote:
Sorry, but please don't try to make it sound like I said that because
that's not an argument at all.
Following what I said before, making steps harder isn't necessarily
going to make people walk through them more carefully.
I don't agree that an on-line code editor woul
On Thu 27 Aug 2009 01:47 +0200, Arkham wrote:
>
> On 27/ago/09, at 01:35, Nélson «VuDu» Cunha wrote:
>
> >Sorry, but please don't try to make it sound like I said that because
> >that's not an argument at all.
> >Following what I said before, making steps harder isn't necessarily
> >going to make
Hey guys,
I went to submit my first package, tigervnc-1.0.0-1 and that went well.
Then I realized that I forgot to add my name to the top of the PKGBUILD
file... Yea I know... So I tried to update the package and couldn't get that
to work. (Later finding out that it was because I had the tar.g
Nathan McBride wrote:
Hey guys,
I went to submit my first package, tigervnc-1.0.0-1 and that went well.
Then I realized that I forgot to add my name to the top of the PKGBUILD
file... Yea I know... So I tried to update the package and couldn't get that
to work. (Later finding out that it was
Thanks very much that fixed it. Wander how I missed that. :D
On Thursday 27 August 2009 00:17:09 Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> Nathan McBride wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I went to submit my first package, tigervnc-1.0.0-1 and that went well.
> > Then I realized that I forgot to add my name to the t
17 matches
Mail list logo
