>
> The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner. I guess it's
> there because it is (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with
> the latest xulrunner.
>
Ah, I didn't notice that... Crisis averted! ;)
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith wrote:
> I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for
> packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in
> extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
>
The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not
I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for
packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in
extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
Just did a build with and without Clang. The difference comes out to about
12MiB, actually -- 69MiB for LLVM, and 81MiB for LLVM+Clang.
12MiB is, incidentally, the size of the /usr/libexec/clang-cc file you
mentioned, so that's basically all the size difference.
Attached is a PKGBUILD which build
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Ranguvar wrote:
> Sorry, no idea what you're talking about in that first paragraph?
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20222
latest comment by neri (i attach my personal latest PKGBUILD to this
mail)
> Where is the PKGBUILD? And what do you mean by scan-* wrappers?
sca
Sorry, no idea what you're talking about in that first paragraph?
Where is the PKGBUILD? And what do you mean by scan-* wrappers?
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I posted my llvm-clang-svn PKGBUILD in AUR, not all of the things made
> it into the actual buil
Thanks,
I posted my llvm-clang-svn PKGBUILD in AUR, not all of the things made
it into the actual build. I like to have all scan-* wrappers included as
they are handy and depend on each other (scan-build -V invokes
scan-view automatically after a test build). They PKGBUILD is in the
comments of th
Very well, I'll make a prototype PKGBUILD that has sections for each install
and then post it here, good luck :)
I do think it odd though that Clang would be larger than GCC, I guess we'll
have to see.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Ranguvar wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Ranguvar wrote:
> It appears that Clang is available as an actual release this time around, so
> no need for SVN :) See this: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#2.6
Oh huebsch! ... or sweet in English ...
>
> As for the splitting of the packages, it will be either diffic
It appears that Clang is available as an actual release this time around, so
no need for SVN :) See this: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#2.6
As for the splitting of the packages, it will be either difficult or
impossible to separate LLVM and Clang, is the problem. Plus, I anticipate
Clan
Hi,
I'm using LLVM myself, especially with clang and the static analyzer. I
would like to see LLVM and clang separated, however the clang version is
only available via svn and that depends on LLVM-svn very much.
So I think it's better to build a general LLVM package with the gcc-
frontend for sta
Hello,
I see that the package 'llvm' is in [community], is orphaned, and is
out-of-date. I've spent considerable time working on packaging LLVM and its
add-ons, the Clang C-family compiler front-end and the GCC frontend.
Therefore, I'd like to help package LLVM.
I already wrote a PKGBUILD for v2.
On Mon 26 Oct 2009 20:30 +0100, Karol Babioch wrote:
> On Mo, 2009-10-26 at 15:27 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
> > Hello everyone.
> > If anyone is wondering what's going on with the AUR, I'm doing server
> > maintenance right now.
> >
> > Things should be back up 'soon'.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
>
> Go
On Mo, 2009-10-26 at 15:27 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
> Hello everyone.
> If anyone is wondering what's going on with the AUR, I'm doing server
> maintenance right now.
>
> Things should be back up 'soon'.
>
> Cheers.
>
Good to know, as I was wondering why the AUR is down without any
announcement
Hello everyone.
If anyone is wondering what's going on with the AUR, I'm doing server
maintenance right now.
Things should be back up 'soon'.
Cheers.
Jaroslav Lichtblau wrote:
> Everyone returns
> Welcome back, Angel!
>
> Cheers
> Jaroslav
They always come back.
¡Enhorabuena, Angel!
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Christian Himpel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the darktable-svn[1] package was replaced with darktable-git[2].
>
> Please remove the darktable-svn package, since subversion is no longer
> supported in this project.
>
>
> Thanks and kind regards,
> chressie
>
> [1] http://aur.a
Hi,
the darktable-svn[1] package was replaced with darktable-git[2].
Please remove the darktable-svn package, since subversion is no longer
supported in this project.
Thanks and kind regards,
chressie
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28117
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?
18 matches
Mail list logo
