On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
> Semester exams are starting next week, so I'll be inactive till 8th Dec.
>
> Cheers,
> Abhishek
>
I wish good results at the exams :)
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Semester exams are starting next week, so I'll be inactive till 8th Dec.
Cheers,
Abhishek
On 11/22/2009 03:35 PM, Phillip Smith wrote:
find ${pkgdir}/.../ -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \;
find ${pkgdir}/.../ -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \;
chmod -R u=rwX,go=rX $pkgdir
The capital X will only set the execute bit on directories, and leave
it untouched on files if it is already set :)
I believe that the discussion period is five days, is that correct?
Is that period now over, then? :)
-- Ranguvar
> find ${pkgdir}/.../ -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \;
> find ${pkgdir}/.../ -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \;
chmod -R u=rwX,go=rX $pkgdir
The capital X will only set the execute bit on directories, and leave
it untouched on files if it is already set :)
> This works only if there are only files in that directory. Subfolders
> are not copied. So one has to run "install" for each folder. "cp" copies
> everything - files and folders.
>
> --
I wrote a function to handle that at some point which I include in
PKGBUILDs on very rare occasions:
functi
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:44:22PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:37 PM, vlad wrote:
> > Hi Allen,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:30:39PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> vlad wrote:
> >> >Hi all,
> >> >
> >> >On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:14:52AM +0100, hollun...@gmx.at wro
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:37 PM, vlad wrote:
> Hi Allen,
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:30:39PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> vlad wrote:
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:14:52AM +0100, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
>> >>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:24 +1000
>> >>Allan McRae wrote:
>> >>
>>
Hi Allen,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:30:39PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> vlad wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:14:52AM +0100, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> >>On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:24 +1000
> >>Allan McRae wrote:
> >>
> >>>If it breaks stuff, then you should tell upstream that t
vlad wrote:
Hi all,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:14:52AM +0100, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:24 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
If it breaks stuff, then you should tell upstream that they makefile
is crap.
So I guess this means it breaks?
I usually do. You'd be surprised how man
Hi all,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:14:52AM +0100, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:24 +1000
> Allan McRae wrote:
>
> >
> > If it breaks stuff, then you should tell upstream that they makefile
> > is crap.
>
> So I guess this means it breaks?
> I usually do. You'd be surprise
hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:24 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:17:36 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
Ray Rashif wrote:
2009/11/22 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
2009/11/21 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi :
hollun...@gmx.at
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> With a package() function, you can actually change the
>>> contents of the package.
>>>
>>> Splitting of the build and package steps is one of the most
>>> u
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:12:24 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
> hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:17:36 +1000
> > Allan McRae wrote:
> >
> >> Ray Rashif wrote:
> >>> 2009/11/22 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
> >>>
> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> > 2009/11/21 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi :
> >>>
Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
With a package() function, you can actually change the
contents of the package.
Splitting of the build and package steps is one of the most
under-appreciated features in the last pacman release. It is really good to
see so
hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:17:36 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
Ray Rashif wrote:
2009/11/22 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
2009/11/21 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi :
hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:24:58 -0300
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
An
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:17:36 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
> Ray Rashif wrote:
> > 2009/11/22 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
> >
> >> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> >>> 2009/11/21 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi :
> >>>
> hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:24:58 -0300
> > Gerardo Exequi
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> With a package() function, you can actually change the
> contents of the package.
>
> Splitting of the build and package steps is one of the most
> under-appreciated features in the last pacman release. It is really good to
> see someone actua
Ranguvar wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Ray Rashif wrote:
Hi Gerardo can you confirm that there are no (owner) permission issues
when
building without fakeroot (i.e all owned by user)? I don't see chown
anywhere other than extract_sources().
If your packaging i
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Ray Rashif wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Gerardo can you confirm that there are no (owner) permission issues
>> when
>> building without fakeroot (i.e all owned by user)? I don't see chown
>> anywhere other than extract_sources().
>>
>>
>
> If your packag
20 matches
Mail list logo
