Re: [aur-general] perl-rename and prename

2009-12-13 Thread Ranguvar
And make prename `replace=('perl-rename')` On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 23:43, Ranguvar wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hello, > > Still a little new to TU work :) > > There are two packages, 'perl-rename' and 'prename'.  Both provide the > same software. > 'prename' is

[aur-general] perl-rename and prename

2009-12-13 Thread Ranguvar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, Still a little new to TU work :) There are two packages, 'perl-rename' and 'prename'. Both provide the same software. 'prename' is out-of-date and orphaned, but IMO has a nicer name, and is much more well-known (votes). 'perl-rename' is les

Re: [aur-general] Installing dependencies via makepkg

2009-12-13 Thread Farhan Yousaf
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:40 PM, edogawaconan wrote: > par2cmdline is in aur which means it must be installed manually Ah. Thought so. Thanks, Farhan

Re: [aur-general] Installing dependencies via makepkg

2009-12-13 Thread edogawaconan
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Farhan Yousaf wrote: > Hi there folks, > > I took over recently on a package called sabnzbd, specifically: > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13691 > > While trying to update the PKGBUILD, I notice that it doesn't install > the depndencies. Is this the e

[aur-general] Installing dependencies via makepkg

2009-12-13 Thread Farhan Yousaf
Hi there folks, I took over recently on a package called sabnzbd, specifically: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13691 While trying to update the PKGBUILD, I notice that it doesn't install the depndencies. Is this the expected behaviour or am I not using the right parameters, i.e. makepk

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2009-12-13 Thread Evangelos Foutras
2009/12/14 Mathieu Pasquet : > Maybe someone can delete cairo-dock-svn, cairo-dock-themes-svn, and > cairo-dock-plugins-svn, > because they switched to git a while ago, so this package isn't useful > anymore. > And also, remove openanno-svn from the AUR, the project's name changed and > is now nam

[aur-general] Removal request

2009-12-13 Thread Mathieu Pasquet
Maybe someone can delete cairo-dock-svn, cairo-dock-themes-svn, and cairo-dock-plugins-svn, because they switched to git a while ago, so this package isn't useful anymore. And also, remove openanno-svn from the AUR, the project's name changed and is now named "Unknown Horizons", so there is a new

[aur-general] Fwd: Orphaning moovida

2009-12-13 Thread Stefan Husmann
Original-Nachricht Betreff: [aur-general] Orphaning moovida Datum: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 18:47:25 +0200 Von: Stefan Husmann Antwort an: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) An: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) Hello TUs, I would like to get ri

Re: [aur-general] TU Voting - Laszlo Papp (djszapi)

2009-12-13 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:48:02 +0300 > schrieb Sergej Pupykin : > >> Hi, TUs, >> >> I have started voting for djszapi. >> >> Application: >> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-December/007520.html >> >> Voting: http://aur.a

Re: [aur-general] TU Voting - Laszlo Papp (djszapi)

2009-12-13 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:48:02 +0300 schrieb Sergej Pupykin : > Hi, TUs, > > I have started voting for djszapi. > > Application: > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-December/007520.html > > Voting: http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=25 > Isn't he now more active for Fruga

Re: [aur-general] move libpthread-stubs to Unsupported

2009-12-13 Thread Ionut Biru
On 12/13/2009 07:57 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: orphan and out-of-date any objections? go for it.

[aur-general] move libpthread-stubs to Unsupported

2009-12-13 Thread Andrea Scarpino
orphan and out-of-date any objections? -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [aur-general] Available: A lot of eggs for Chicken Scheme...

2009-12-13 Thread Chris Brannon
Jim Pryor wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:27:59PM -0600, Chris Brannon wrote: > > Jim Pryor wrote: > > > What should I do? Post them to AUR and maintain them minimally > > > until someone else comes along who can commit more seriously to them? > > > > That sounds reasonable to me. > > Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Available: A lot of eggs for Chicken Scheme...

2009-12-13 Thread Jim Pryor
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:27:59PM -0600, Chris Brannon wrote: > Jim Pryor wrote: > > I'm exploring various Scheme implementations and at the moment am liking > > Chicken. I don't know the community very well, but it sounds like it's > > one of the large and active Scheme communities. For the casua