Re: [aur-general] Help in building i686 packages needed

2010-01-09 Thread Ray Rashif
2010/1/10 Chris Brannon : >> I also need a rebuild on acerhk. It is an i686-only kernel module, a >> simple pkgrel bump should be more than enough. By the way, I don't >> even use the driver anymore, rebuilding is not much of a hassle, but >> if any TU uses it, feel free to take it. > > Hi Corrado,

Re: [aur-general] Help in building i686 packages needed

2010-01-09 Thread Chris Brannon
> I also need a rebuild on acerhk. It is an i686-only kernel module, a > simple pkgrel bump should be more than enough. By the way, I don't > even use the driver anymore, rebuilding is not much of a hassle, but > if any TU uses it, feel free to take it. Hi Corrado, I rebuilt acerhk for you, and I

Re: [aur-general] Help in building i686 packages needed

2010-01-09 Thread bardo
2010/1/7 bardo : > I'm currently unable to build i686 packages in a clean chroot. Can > anybody help? I also need a rebuild on acerhk. It is an i686-only kernel module, a simple pkgrel bump should be more than enough. By the way, I don't even use the driver anymore, rebuilding is not much of a has

Re: [aur-general] rfkill package

2010-01-09 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2010/1/8, Thomas Bächler : > Maybe we should even move this to extra or even core. Giovanni, this > seems to be your package, what do you think? Hi Thomas, I agree to move rfkill to extra or even core, but at the moment I'm very busy with my job and my family. Please, if you want to move rfkill

[aur-general] Module breakage (WAS: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.3-1)

2010-01-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 08.01.2010 09:06, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Hi guys, > bump to latest bugfix version. > > Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE One of these changes broke aufs, a