On 17/02/10 16:29, Chris Baker wrote:
> Attached is a PKGBUILD that should work. It fails due to a bug in their
> version numbering system. Oh the irony!
Thanks for that. It got me off in the right direction.
I've attached a slightly updated version that seems to work fine.
/M
--
Magnus Thern
On 17 February 2010 15:13, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> due to a change in the package generation it's been deprecated by
> perl6-junction
>
> --
> Caleb Cushing
>
> http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
Done.
--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
Am Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:19:14 +0100
schrieb Hervé Cauwelier :
> Is it planned or do you recommend that I stick with separate
> PKGBUILDs with the same source tarball?
Maybe you should vote for this feature request:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16394?project=2
Greetings,
Heiko
Attached is a PKGBUILD that should work. It fails due to a bug in their
version numbering system. Oh the irony!
Chris
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I've found a few distributed bugtrackers on AUR, but I really wanted
> to check out Bugs Everywhere[1]. I can't find it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:46:06 -0500
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> I don't know if it's possible... but aCiD2 left the arch community a
> while ago... is it possible to mass orphan his packages? or transfer
> them? I've picked up a good share already. At th
On 02/17/10 15:15, Allan McRae wrote:
On 18/02/10 00:08, Hervé Cauwelier wrote:
[...]
But then I can't upload the new source package. I get:
Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed.
"lpod-docs-html" was accepted so I'm surprised "lpod-docs" isn't.
But that is not the pkgname...
pkg
On 18/02/10 00:08, Hervé Cauwelier wrote:
Hi,
I packaged two simple documentation packages:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34297
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34298
They come from the same source package but at that time, I didn't even
know build multiple binaries from a si
Hi,
I packaged two simple documentation packages:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34297
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34298
They come from the same source package but at that time, I didn't even
know build multiple binaries from a single PKGBUILD was possible.
So I've merg
I've found a few distributed bugtrackers on AUR, but I really wanted
to check out Bugs Everywhere[1]. I can't find it on AUR though. This
could be due to my weak search-fu skills, so I thought I'd asking here
before going the manual route.
/M
[1]: http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
--
Hi Folks,
I'm a friend of Dop182, and here in Brazil we are in holiday since 12 Feb.
and ends today (17 Feb.). I believe this is the reason for delay in update.
--
Leandro Inácio
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:00, Lex Rivera wrote:
> No. I am too lazy to generate for md5sums for all achitectures
On 02/17/2010 02:44 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
sorry accidentally uploaded this package because it's not up to date
in extra. please remove (already flagged the extra one as out of date)
Done
sorry accidentally uploaded this package because it's not up to date
in extra. please remove (already flagged the extra one as out of date)
--
Caleb Cushing
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
No. I am too lazy to generate for md5sums for all achitectures =/ But
looks like Dop just adopted most-voted package in AUR.
On 17/02/10 01:55, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote:
> On 02/17/2010 01:52 AM, Lex Rivera wrote:
> >Current virtualbox_bin maintainer (Dop182) adopted package, but has no
13 matches
Mail list logo
